28 Sep '09 00:08>
Originally posted by TerrierJackI'm not even sure I can understand what you're saying.
What is "existed forever?" Another thing bound up with your experience of time.
Likewise you posit the "spiritual" as just "that state outside of everything I have experience of." Don't you see that given that definition someone can (and many do) say anything they like about "that?" You are free to do so (and free to believe that you are not just an ...[text shortened]... ) but please don't call it "thinking." Thinking involves reason - not just feelings.
It sounds alot like an argument. After all, the point I was making was in reply to another's post which was in reply to a post of mine.
So I think your comments are missed directed in that they don't address the original idea in any meaningful way. imo