@kellyjay saidDo you not understand the concept of a red herring and why it's a logical fallacy? Clearly DG doesn't. Even after having been given a link to an article that explains it in the simplest terms possible, DG still doesn't.
Why is it you bump for others to answer, and yet you refuse to answer questions
put to you?
Also have you considered the fact that I don't know if jaywill has seen my response to his post? What? There might be more than one reason to "bump"? How can that possibly be?
Have to give credit to jaywill. At least he tried to address the topic of this thread unlike you and DG. To your credit at least you generally try to address the topics of threads in which you participate unlike DG.
@thinkofone saidI understand hiding and ducking from answers you refuse to give, you are now
Do you not understand the concept of a red herring and why it's a logical fallacy? Clearly DG doesn't. Even after having been given a link to an article that explains it in the simplest terms possible, DG still doesn't.
Also have you considered the fact that I don't know if jaywill has seen my response to his post? What? There might be more than one reason to "bump"? H ...[text shortened]... edit at least you generally try to address the topics of threads in which you participate unlike DG.
famous for it.
1 edit
@kellyjay saidYet you're the one "hiding and ducking" from the points I made in my previous post.
I understand hiding and ducking from answers you refuse to give, you are now
famous for it.
Yet you're the one "hiding and ducking" from the points I've been making on the topic of this thread.
Funny that.
What? The above are examples of why a red herring is a logical fallacy? How can that possibly be?
@thinkofone saidLOL, yea right...I give you answers and they don't fit your *these are good scriptures*
Yet you're the one "hiding and ducking" from the points I made in my previous post.
Yet you're the one "hiding and ducking" from the points I've been making on the topic of this thread.
Funny that.
What? The above are examples of why a red herring is a logical fallacy? How can that possibly be?
so you don't count them. Then when you are asked to explain how anyone else
can tell what are good scriptures you, duck and hide.
It would be helpful if you'd just be straightforward instead of your hit and run
tactics, then running and hiding when confronted with questions you don't want
to answer.
@kellyjay saidLet's see.
LOL, yea right...I give you answers and they don't fit your *these are good scriptures*
so you don't count them. Then when you are asked to explain how anyone else
can tell what are good scriptures you, duck and hide.
It would be helpful if you'd just be straightforward instead of your hit and run
tactics, then running and hiding when confronted with questions you don't want
to answer.
I posted the following:
Yet you're the one "hiding and ducking" from the points I made in my previous post.
Yet you're the one "hiding and ducking" from the points I've been making on the topic of this thread.
Funny that.
What? The above are examples of why a red herring is a logical fallacy? How can that possibly be?
And you respond with yet another red herring. A red herring wrapped in an ad hominem attack no less.
You're really something KJ.
@thinkofone saidHardly what you are claiming is knownledge about what is in other people’s hearts, and that people who you don’t even know. I am talking about is how you conduct yourself here.
Let's see.
I posted the following:Yet you're the one "hiding and ducking" from the points I made in my previous post.
Yet you're the one "hiding and ducking" from the points I've been making on the topic of this thread.
Funny that.
What? The above are examples of why a red herring is a logical fallacy? How can that possibly be?
And you r ...[text shortened]... red herring. A red herring wrapped in an ad hominem attack no less.
You're really something KJ.
2 edits
@kellyjay saidThis is an example of why it's really difficult to have a meaningful discussion with you. You can't even keep track of what's being discussed on THIS thread.
Hardly what you are claiming is knownledge about what is in other people’s hearts, and that people who you don’t even know. I am talking about is how you conduct yourself here.
Between you and DG, the topic of this thread has been completely derailed. If either of you were able to logically refute the points of my posts that address the topic of this thread, you would. But you can't. So you derail the discussion.
@thinkofone saidYes you are right I was wrong, apologizes!
This is an example of why it's really difficult to have a meaningful discussion with you. You can't even keep track of what's being discussed on THIS thread.
Between you and DG, the topic of this thread has been completely derailed. If either of you were able to logically refute the points of my posts that address the topic of this thread, you would. But you can't. So you derail the discussion.