13 May '13 19:25>
Originally posted by TaomanGreetings!
Thank you for that deeper explanation; I was approaching from elsewhere. Greetings.
Oh the Lamp is heavy😵
Originally posted by black beetleYes indeed, for there is no opponent in chess, for there is no I, all that is important is the chess board and the juxtaposition of the chessmen.
Whenever I am fully aware of the fact that I am a patzer, I do not insult myself but I press myself to try harder; I just think lightly of myself and deeply of the world, my favourite!
😵
Originally posted by black beetleno need of bowing to this tea boy dear Beetle, this aforementioned idea is not very original, but it is of great practical value, for one is freed to a certain extent from the ego and all the treacheries that it manifests, from optimism and pessimism, to worrying about our opponents relative strength, to self loathing due to our propensity for aberration.
I bow, my trusty feer Robbie😵
Originally posted by Proper KnobI can get my kid to get changed after school and put his homework away with just a look.
I can assure you I'm perfectly relaxed whe I play and when I practice. I worked out a long time ago that frustration does help the learning process.
Can you give an example of something which can achieved by hardly lifting a finger.
Originally posted by stellspalfieyou nuts? no sweaty action?
if you could achieve orgasm for yourself and your partner instantly, without all the hot sweaty action, would you?
if you could click your fingers and make an amazing meal to feed your family appear without the hassle of cooking, would you?
if you could make your child instantly absorb all your life wisdom in a split second without slowly teaching them over the years as they grow, would you?
Originally posted by karoly aczelYes indeed. I like the "Do Nothing Day" idea.
The planet would also appreciate us doing less. Anything beyond survival and a decent education should be questioned. "Am I just doing all this extra work to have more and be richer [hence happier, as the mass media likes to infer 😕 ], ?
I recommend having an international "Do Nothing Day" .
I believe there was an international "Buy Nothing" day star report on it ,favourably or unfavourably, then it will fade away. It's working so far 🙁
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOh well, methinks his general choices of the opening appeared to be influenced by understandings and conscious intentions triggering into existence complicated experiential feedbacks, an unbearable reality based on an action-respond field. Then his middlegame plans were developed out of the probabilities that were associated with the dynamism of the position, and at that phase he was counting deeply, creating a burden too heavy for the shoulders of the rival.
no need of bowing to this tea boy dear Beetle, this aforementioned idea is not very original, but it is of great practical value, for one is freed to a certain extent from the ego and all the treacheries that it manifests, from optimism and pessimism, to worrying about our opponents relative strength, to self loathing due to our propensity for aberra ...[text shortened]... e tried to force the chessboard to conform to his will and was justly punished for his iniquity.
Originally posted by black beetleI was wondering when a 'chess rating' euphemism would be introduced.
Whenever I am fully aware of the fact that I am a patzer, I do not insult myself but I press myself to try harder; I just think lightly of myself and deeply of the world, my favourite!
😵
Originally posted by divegeesterAttachment to one's view and aversion to the views of the others are merely a conception. Why don't you overcome attachment and aggression and then analyse, enjoying and sharing your analysis and seeing on your own what you 'll get? What exactly is the obstacle?
I was wondering when a 'chess rating' euphemism would be introduced.
Originally posted by black beetleYour childish insults thinly veiled as Buddhist musings ceased from inciting the desired effect about 2.5 years ago, however your MO remains of interest. I guess you can fool some, but not all.
Attachment to one's view and aversion to the views of the others are merely a conception. Why don't you overcome attachment and aggression and then analyse, enjoying and sharing your analysis and seeing on your own what you 'll get? What exactly is the obstacle?
😵
Originally posted by divegeesterI don't know what "MO" means, I act without expectations and I don't have the intention to imply any kind of "desired effect". I never told you to value what I value and to avoid what I avoid.
Your childish insults thinly veiled as Buddhist musings ceased from inciting the desired effect about 2.5 years ago, however your MO remains of interest. I guess you can fool some, but not all.