08 Feb '13 02:45>
Acts 2:44-45
Originally posted by rwingettI believe home ownership was pushed so strongly in America precisely for this reason - ie a home owner - or rather someone with a big mortgage, is less likely to go on strike or be involved in labour unrest. It has the unfortunate side effect that it encourages sprawling environmentally unfriendly car-centric cities and a less mobile work force.
Although your home is perhaps the biggest link in the chain that binds you to that system of iniquities, ....
Originally posted by twhiteheadAccording to the Holy Bible the earth or land ultimately belongs to God, for He is the creator and maker. But God has given temporary possession of portions of land to various people and it is clear from Genesis that mankind was created to be the caretakers of the land.
I believe home ownership was pushed so strongly in America precisely for this reason - ie a home owner - or rather someone with a big mortgage, is less likely to go on strike or be involved in labour unrest. It has the unfortunate side effect that it encourages sprawling environmentally unfriendly car-centric cities and a less mobile work force.
Originally posted by RJHindsam i supposed to read all this then argue with you like it was your opinion? f**** off i know you are getting old but there is no excuse for your cut and paste apathy.
According to the Holy Bible the earth or land ultimately belongs to God, for He is the creator and maker. But God has given temporary possession of portions of land to various people and it is clear from Genesis that mankind was created to be the caretakers of the land.
There are many places in the New Testament that land and home ownership is recognized ...[text shortened]... arly: “Thou shalt not steal.”
http://chalcedon.edu/research/articles/the-bible-and-property/
Originally posted by RJHinds"There are many places in the New Testament that land and home ownership is recognized. For example, the verses in the book of Acts, that were previously posted, mentions the selling of land which some of the Christians owned in order to benefit all the members of the church."
According to the Holy Bible the earth or land ultimately belongs to God, for He is the creator and maker. But God has given temporary possession of portions of land to various people and it is clear from Genesis that mankind was created to be the caretakers of the land.
There are many places in the New Testament that land and home ownership is recognized ...[text shortened]... arly: “Thou shalt not steal.”
http://chalcedon.edu/research/articles/the-bible-and-property/
Originally posted by JS357I own two houses, including the land property, that the city/county government makes me pay taxes on. So I see nothing wrong with individuals, like myself and the early Christians and Jews spoken of in the Bible, owning and leaving land as an inheritance. I just don't believe it should be taxed by the government, but I am not making a big fuss about it either. In America, Churches own the land and the building that they meet own. I do not know of any Church that leases the property, even though there may be some. I am not against Business and corporations owning land either. It is some of the other posters on this forum that have a problem with it, not me.
"There are many places in the New Testament that land and home ownership is recognized. For example, the verses in the book of Acts, that were previously posted, mentions the selling of land which some of the Christians owned in order to benefit all the members of the church."
This is an interesting example, as it suggests that the benefit of the community ...[text shortened]... mmunity as a corporation, in the US anyway.) But what's wrong with this, Biblically speaking?
Originally posted by stellspalfieIt is never about what others have as it is how they got it, if they earned it by effort
where would you be without the 'fair police' at the boston tea party? or the french revolution?
is you have no problem with how much money a person can own. how would you feel if 1 person had 99.9% of the planets money?
Originally posted by KellyJayProperty ownership and wealth disparity create an un-level playing field by their very nature. The rich have an advantage over the poor - and in the last 20 years or so we are seeing them taking advantage of that to great effect.
It is never about what others have as it is how they got it, if they earned it by effort
on a level playing ground for everyone else, more power to them.
Originally posted by KellyJayWealth can be measured in many ways.
, I'm of the opinion that the more wealthy people we have the
better off we all are. What is it to me that someone else has money?
Originally posted by wolfgang59Who is saying if we allow land to be owned it will mean a single individual will
Wealth can be measured in many ways.
Money.
Happiness.
Property.
Land.
Money is limitless
Happiness is limitless
Property is virtually limitless
Land is finite
Do we want a future where the land is owned by a single individual?
(Because that is the eventual outcome of current systems)
Originally posted by wolfgang59I guess that one individual person will be Jesus. 😏
Wealth can be measured in many ways.
Money.
Happiness.
Property.
Land.
Money is limitless
Happiness is limitless
Property is virtually limitless
Land is finite
Do we want a future where the land is owned by a single individual?
(Because that is the eventual outcome of current systems)
Originally posted by KellyJaydo you believe that there is an unlimited or limited amount of money in the world?
It is never about what others have as it is how they got it, if they earned it by effort
on a level playing ground for everyone else, more power to them. I do not begruge
anyone their wealth, I'm of the opinion that the more wealthy people we have the
better off we all are. What is it to me that someone else has money?
With respect to the tea party at ...[text shortened]... ld. If you
work for your money good for you, if you steal from another different story.
Kelly