Originally posted by @romans1009 to divegeesterBut if divegeester―like you claim you have―[and I am quoting you here] has "...accepted Jesus Christ into [his] heart and [he has] received God’s Holy Spirit indwelling [in him] [...] [and if he is] sincere in [his] acceptance of Christ, God’s Holy Spirit will indwell [him] and begin to change [his] heart, and, consequently, [his] behavior", just as you claim has happened to you, how can he possibly be a "soulless and sick guy"?
You’re a soulless and sick guy.
Is it also possible for you to be a "soulless and sick guy" even though you claim to have "accepted Jesus Christ" and to have "God’s Holy Spirit will indwelling" you?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmfDo you believe the totality of a person's behavior is encapsulated in what they post on an internet forum?
But if divegeester―like you claim you have―[and I am quoting you here] has "...accepted Jesus Christ into [his] heart and [he has] received God’s Holy Spirit indwelling [in him] [...] [and if he is] sincere in [his] acceptance of Christ, God’s Holy Spirit will indwell [him] and begin to change [his] heart, and, consequently, [his] behavior", just as you claim h ...[text shortened]... h you claim to have "accepted Jesus Christ" and to have "God’s Holy Spirit will indwelling" you?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerOf course not. But Romans1009 has asserted that divegeester is "a soulless and sick guy" based on what he has posted on an internet forum. It's odd that you are asking me about this and not Romans1009.
Do you believe the totality of a person's behavior is encapsulated in what they post on an internet forum?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
1 edit
Originally posted by @fmfWhy then are you asking Romans if his behavior here is indicative of someone who is filled with the Holy Spirit? Why don't you ask Dive the same question?
Of course not. But Romans1009 has asserted that divegeester is "a soulless and sick guy" based on what he has posted on an internet forum. It's odd that you are asking me about this and not Romans1009.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerBecause it is Romans1009 who has made repeated claims on this forum about the impact of "God's Holy Spirit" on his behaviour ~ and not divegeester.
Why then are you asking Romans if his behavior here is indicative of someone who is filled with the Holy Spirit? Why don't you ask Dive the same question?
1 edit
Originally posted by @dj2beckerHe has claimed that "God's Holy Spirit" helps him to remember which scriptures to copy paste without having to look them up. He has claimed this several times. Copy pasting profusely is a key element of his behaviour on this forum.
The impact of his behavior on this forum? Really? Can you quote him?
He has also claimed that, although he admits to succumbing to the "flesh", as he puts it, he exhibits a longsuffering nature, good faith and temperance on this forum. He has attributed these behavioural attributes to what he claims is him "having the indwelt Holy Spirit".
I'm not going to track down the actual quotes themselves. For me to report that he has said these things is not controversial.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo you think either divegeester or Romans1009 are "soulless and sick guys"?
Why then are you asking Romans if his behavior here is indicative of someone who is filled with the Holy Spirit? Why don't you ask Dive the same question?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmfCan you quote something that he has said that you think doesn't exhibit a longsuffering nature, good faith and temperance on this forum?
He has claimed that "God's Holy Spirit" helps him to remember which scriptures to copy paste without having to look them up. He has claimed this several times. Copy pasting profusely is a key element of his behaviour on this forum.
He has also claimed that, although he admits to succumbing to the "flesh", as he puts it, he exhibits a longsuffering nature, go ...[text shortened]... e actual quotes themselves. For me to report that he has said these things is not controversial.