The trinity and Romans1009

Originally posted by @dj2becker
These decent adult Christians you know and love and live amongst they never speak to you about the Holy Spirit?

Of course, they do. But none of them are like Romans1009. I have never met or known a Christian before in my entire life who would claim that copy-pasting stuff on the internet is a sign that "God's Holy Spirit" is "indwelling" in them or that looking after their mother was an example of 'Christian good works'. Never. Not even once. Are there a lot of Romans1009-type Christians out there that I have just not run into?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Are you opposed to Romans calling things as he sees them? Or is only your gang allowed to do that?

Everybody can post what they want to post. Everybody can behave how they want. Everybody can comment on each other's behaviour and what they see as they see fit, just as both you and I are doing now.

Originally posted by @fmf
Of course, they do. But none of them are like Romans1009. I have never met or known a Christian before in my entire life who would claim that copy-pasting stuff on the internet is a sign that "God's Holy Spirit" is "indwelling" in them or that looking after their mother was an example of 'Christian good works'. Never. Not even once. Are there a lot of Romans1009-type Christians out there that I have just not run into?

How do you know that your Christian friends would react differently if they have never been in this community? I think you are just making projections that suit you.

Originally posted by @fmf
Everybody can post what they want to post. Everybody can behave how they want. Everybody can comment on each other's behaviour and what they see as they see fit, just as both you and I are doing now.

Fantastic. So why are you opposed to Romans calling things as he sees them but have no problem when Dive does it? Is it maybe because you and Dive are drinking buddies?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Fantastic. So why are you opposed to Romans calling things as he sees them but have no problem when Dive does it? Is it maybe because you and Dive are drinking buddies?

I am not "opposed" to it. Are you "opposed" to me calling things as I see them?
Re-read what I wrote in the post you are replying to.

Originally posted by @fmf
I am not "opposed" to it. Are you "opposed" to me calling things as I see them?
Re-read what I wrote in the post you are replying to.

If you are not opposed to it what on earth are you on about?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
How do you know that your Christian friends would react differently if they have never been in this community?

Adult intuition and an ability to read people.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If you are not opposed to it what on earth are you on about?

Commenting. Observing. Asking. Speculating. Discussing. Debating,

Originally posted by @fmf
Adult intuition and an ability to read people.

Have you met Romans 1009 personally and spent as much time with him as you have done with your Christian friends? If not you are making conclusions with inadequate data.

Originally posted by @fmf
Adult intuition and an ability to read people.

You know DIve at a personal level, is that why you don't read much into his behavior on these forums?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Have you met Romans 1009 personally and spent as much time with him as you have done with your Christian friends? If not you are making conclusions with inadequate data.

I think he's one of the biggest jerks I have ever met here on this website and I think he ought to be an embarrassment to the Christians here. Maybe he is. Or maybe not. As for you, I really think he ought to be an embarrassment to you as a Christian. Apparently, he is not.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
You know DIve at a personal level, is that why you don't read much into his behavior on these forums?

If I call him a "soulless and sick guy" and a "jerk" in public for you will that lay the matter to rest?

Originally posted by @fmf
I think he's one of the biggest jerks I have ever met here on this website and I think he ought to be an embarrassment to the Christians here. Maybe he is. Or maybe not. As for you, I really think he ought to be an embarrassment to you as a Christian. Apparently, he is not.

Let me guess, when Dive calls things as he sees it and uses foul language, it's perfectly OK. But when Romans simply calls things as he sees it without using any foul language he is an embarrassment to the Christians here?

Originally posted by @fmf
If I call him a "soulless and sick guy" and a "jerk" in public for you will that lay the matter to rest?

🙄

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Let me guess, when Dive calls things as he sees it and uses foul language, it's perfectly OK. But when Romans simply calls things as he sees it without using any foul language he is an embarrassment to the Christians here?

I admire divegeester as a fellow community member and as a Christian. I don't admire you and I don't admire Romans1009. I don't care about "foul language".