21 Sep '11 23:58>
Originally posted by googlefudgeSo it's a race to see if your vaunted technology liberates you before it destroys you. Well, I say that's a race you'll lose. You'll destroy the biosphere long before you've liberated yourselves from any terrestrial confines. Your 'space colony' is a pipe dream that relieves you from having to deal with the problem of biosphere destruction in a serious manner. Just push if off into the future and hope against all hope that technology will save you in the end.
ahh, so you meant the biosphere... well say so.
I don't think so.
I think it entirely possible we will massively change [and from most reasonable
perspectives adversely so] the biosphere.
It is very unlikely we will destroy it.
I support action to prevent this, and alleviate the problem.
But it requires high technology, it's just not possibl ...[text shortened]... to survive we have to go into space, which means high technology,
which means civilisation.
But you don't get to pick and choose. A technological mode of thinking ALWAYS assumes that more technology is better. Just a little more technology will cure what ails us. It can conceive of no appropriate limitation to its breadth and scope. Every available technological pursuit must be followed to the end, regardless of where it may lead. One of the things I admire about the Amish and the Hutterites is that they do not accept this near deification of technology. They determine the effect technology will have on them and do not allow it to be the other way around.
Obviously, any solution toward sustainability is going to require either a reduction in the total number of people, or a reduction is their consumption levels. Probably both. Greater levels of technology ALWAYS lead to greater levels of consumption. Always. A space faring society will have levels of consumption that far exceed the bloated levels we have now. If our desires remained constant, then maybe an advancing technology might hope to meet them. But that's not the way it works. Advancing levels of technology breed ever increasing levels of consumption. It's a never ending cycle of technology trying vainly to outpace our growing desires. The end can only come when we're forced off of that cycle by a biosphere that is crashing all around us.
Your attempts to "alleviate" the problem are pathetic. For your attempts to relieve the problem are part of the problem itself. You've got to get off that runaway train, googlefudge, before it's too late. One way or another it's going to derail.