15 Jul '13 09:16>
Originally posted by stellspalfieThose fat people that you claim are shoving their fat faces with more pizza and kool-aid. 😏
what fat people?
The Instructor
Originally posted by stellspalfieYou must have some strong reason for not forgiving fat people for shoving their fat faces with more pizza and kool-aid. What else would make such a forgiving person as yourself refuse to forgive? Could it be that you are not very forgiving after all?
where did i say that i despise fat people? have you understood the thread?
Originally posted by RJHindsthere is nothing to forgive, im not a christian, i dont believe gluttony is a sin.
You must have some strong reason for not forgiving fat people for shoving their fat faces with more pizza and kool-aid. What else would make such a forgiving person as yourself refuse to forgive? Could it be that you are not very forgiving after all?
The Instructor
Originally posted by stellspalfieI am against abortion on many grounds. There is conservative, Republican, capitalist, moral, and religious grounds that quickly come to mind. But, unlike your refusal to forgive the fat person, I will forgive the abortionist, even knowing it is wrong.
there is nothing to forgive, im not a christian, i dont believe gluttony is a sin.
question for you r.j.
are you anti-abortion on religious grounds?
Originally posted by RJHindsconservative,republican and capitalist?????
I am against abortion on many grounds. There is conservative, Republican, capitalist, moral, and religious grounds that quickly come to mind. But, unlike your refusal to forgive the fat person, I will forgive the abortionist, even knowing it is wrong.
The Instructor
Originally posted by SwissGambitYou're not lazy, old friend. I don't hold the Torah as moral authority (after all, I'm not into either "divine command" or "categorical imperatives" when it comes to all that). But I have an interest in both the traditions (myths, philosophies, poetry, stories), and--perhaps because I take a largely "literary critical approach"--I think that they are valid as such, and that (sometimes deliberately) hidden gems can be found there [as they can in Aesop, and Zen stories/koans]. I am also fascinated by the Jewish midrashic/talmudic hermeneutics (which predates Christ, and is paradigmatically different from most Christian strategies of reading); and it is quite "post-modern". I discovered that Judaism is just not what I always thought it was. 🙂
When the bible talks about it, it is harsh in its condemnation.
Edit: but I take the lazy way out and discard the bible as a moral authority, whereas some, like vistesd, have presented compelling cases that they weren't really talking about the same thing as today's Christians.
Originally posted by vistesdThanks. And I did not mean to imply that you regard the bible as moral authority, but rather that you work harder at redeeming some of the passages than I do (assuming I don't just give up on them outright 🙂)
You're not lazy, old friend. I don't hold the Torah as moral authority (after all, I'm not into either "divine command" or "categorical imperatives" when it comes to all that). But I have an interest in both the traditions (myths, philosophies, poetry, stories), and--perhaps because I take a largely "literary critical approach"--I think that they are valid shner says the same thing that Zen does--just inside a different "language game".
Originally posted by SwissGambitAbraham may have failed a test, but his belief in God is said to have been credited to him as righteoursness anyway.
Thanks. And I did not mean to imply that you regard the bible as moral authority, but rather that you work harder at redeeming some of the passages than I do (assuming I don't just give up on them outright 🙂)
I've always found your posts on Judaism interesting, particularly the ones where people argued for different interpretations of scripture, like Abraham failing the test by attempting to sacrifice Isaac.