13 Mar '07 00:06>2 edits
Originally posted by lucifershammer1. It's not "my religion's evidence"; it's evidence available to any reasonable person.
1. It's not "my religion's evidence"; it's evidence available to any reasonable person.
2. You've misunderstood my point. A person with little or no moral culpability for his blasphemy is not "screwed".
But phraseology issues aside, this evidence which (luckily for you 😉 ) acts as vindication for your own particular faith does refute any and all assertions made by those who follow a different religion that their belief system is correct whilst all others are more wrong or flawed than theirs, yes?
Also, for all people that present their own evidence to the contrary, they have made a mistake, yes?
2. You've misunderstood my point. A person with little or no moral culpability for his blasphemy is not "screwed".
So if person X (a nice person perhaps who with or without a belief in deities has a set of morals comparable to some person that subscribes to your belief system) doesn't worship your deity, in fact if X tells all Y who follow your deity that they made a mistake and that your deity is lies (because being a nice person he wants everyone to be liberated from what he believes to be a fallacy)...X will still be (how shall I put this...) saved?
Or is it true that despite being a nice and morally sound person he shall be condemned for his un-swaying dedication to a different belief system? (including atheism)