03 Jun 14
Originally posted by ZahlanziOh, I wrote a feed-back to the Forum Moderators too. They know. Let's see if they react.
on the RHP forums, nobody can hear you scream.
I want the Science Forum to be a creationist free zone. If I want to read their religious propaganda, then I go to the Spiritual Forum where those belong. I hate those marathon religious threads that goes on forever.
If all of us sharing the same anti-creationist idea make aware to the moderators that we really want a creationist free zone, then perhaps we get it.
03 Jun 14
Originally posted by FabianFnasHe used that video in spiritual, under 'fossil record supports creation', it's the last post there.
Oh, I wrote a feed-back to the Forum Moderators too. They know. Let's see if they react.
I want the Science Forum to be a creationist free zone. If I want to read their religious propaganda, then I go to the Spiritual Forum where those belong. I hate those marathon religious threads that goes on forever.
If all of us sharing the same anti-creationis ...[text shortened]... ake aware to the moderators that we really want a creationist free zone, then perhaps we get it.
03 Jun 14
Originally posted by FabianFnasthey won't.
Oh, I wrote a feed-back to the Forum Moderators too. They know. Let's see if they react.
I want the Science Forum to be a creationist free zone. If I want to read their religious propaganda, then I go to the Spiritual Forum where those belong. I hate those marathon religious threads that goes on forever.
If all of us sharing the same anti-creationis ...[text shortened]... ake aware to the moderators that we really want a creationist free zone, then perhaps we get it.
they only take the time to send me messages warning me not to say "fuk" or "sh|t" (this spelled with a 1 is still not ok) because it might make people cry. also warning me against trying to trick their profanity filter.
03 Jun 14
Originally posted by RJHindsno it is not worth discussing.
It is a valid topic in both Forums that is worth discussing. Isn't science supposed to search for the truth?
this is not up for debate. the young age of the earth is a garbage notion, proven to be garbage and has 0 evidence to support it.
03 Jun 14
in case you might start to cry that i am being overly zealous with the use of "yec retards", i just want you to know, and this is a solemn promise: i don't mind you posting in the spirituality forum. it is quite alright. i probably won't respond to your zealotry but you are free to do what you wish.
posting here this utter garbage is not ok. it is insulting. it is trolling. it is you desperately seeking approval for a retarded notion that doesn't have any support.
to put it plainly and without sugarcoating, anyone believing in a young earth after reading all the science available is functionally retarded annd shouldn't be trusted to hold any position that requires more than 10 seconds of thinking.
03 Jun 14
Originally posted by ZahlanziThe video presents evidence published in peer reviewed scientific journals, so your statement is obviously false.
no it is not worth discussing.
this is not up for debate. the young age of the earth is a garbage notion, proven to be garbage and has 0 evidence to support it.
