@josephw saidThis is not an answer to the question. Obviously, any constitution in any country can be amended. The question is this: What do you think would be the electoral mathematics, both at the ballot box and in the legislatures, that would render such an amendment valid?
A theocracy is antithetical to the constitution. It ain't gonna happen.
1 edit
@josephw saidThe constitution doesn't need to be amended. The efforts of those that seek to do so see and know that the constitution, as is, is an impediment to an ideological agenda that is in opposition to the freedoms guaranteed to Americans. I promise you this, there will be a revolution if the leftists continue to force, unconstitutionally, their agenda to supplant the constitution with a socialist/Marxist form of government. In fact, that revolution is already in motion. I grew up in America. I've witnessed 50 years of the policies of leftist/liberalism literally destroy this culture in the name of freedom and progressivism. All lies! Now "they" are gunning for our constitutional rights, mainly the first and second amendments, and the confrontation may very well be bloody. I'm not a politician, so I couldn't care less about electoral mathematics, or polling data or anything else. It took a revolution to form our constitution and country, and it will probably take a revolution to keep it.
The constitution doesn't need to be amended. The efforts of those that seek to do so see and know that the constitution, as is, is an impediment to an ideological agenda that is in opposition to the freedoms guaranteed to Americans.
I promise you this, there will be a revolution if the leftists continue to force, unconstitutionally, their agenda to supplant the constitutio ...[text shortened]...
A theocracy is antithetical to the constitution. It ain't gonna happen.
Your question is moot.
This is all tangential and evasive waffle. Furthermore, I don't think you have the slightest clue what "Marxist" means; so, I'll add politically illiterate to the list,
@josephw saidIs that why y'all want Trump back in the WH?
Actually, we read the constitution, learn from experience and try not to repeat history.
If you do, then you:
1. Don't read the Constitution.
2. Don't learn from experience.
3. Really want to repeat history.
@josephw saidYou have the wrong end of the stick here, man.
The constitution doesn't need to be amended. The efforts of those that seek to do so see and know that the constitution, as is, is an impediment to an ideological agenda that is in opposition to the freedoms guaranteed to Americans.
I promise you this, there will be a revolution if the leftists continue to force, unconstitutionally, their agenda to supplant the constitutio ...[text shortened]...
A theocracy is antithetical to the constitution. It ain't gonna happen.
Your question is moot.
@fmf saidThey would have to secede from the union or perhaps just renegotiate themselves into be an autonomous state or a special territory, IMO.
If there were a country or a state where a portion of the population wanted to amend its constitution in order to become a theocracy, what do you think would be the democratic mathematics, so to speak, that would render such a change valid and just?