23 Jun '13 04:43>
The trinity fact or fiction?
http://www.auburn.edu/~allenkc/trinity.html
http://www.auburn.edu/~allenkc/trinity.html
Originally posted by galveston75Well, it is possible to learn something, even from the evilutionists. 😀
Wow Ron it just hit me and it's so clear now. You are an "evolutionist of the trinity" believer.
I see you really like that "strawman" word lately and that is so funny as that's the favorite word the evolutionist love to use when they speak down to ones who do not believe in evolution to try and shoot us down with disrespect.
So now I see you are do ...[text shortened]... d and who he truly is...
Yes you are a true "theory of the trinity" instructor RJ....
Originally posted by galveston75Yes, I understand the idea of an ambassador representing a country and agree the the Son came from Heaven as God's representive to man on Earth. So what?
Would you respond to my questions I asked you in the above post about the spokesman for another country? Do you even slightly understand the comparison?
Originally posted by galveston75Go back and read my first post, because you are doing the strawman thing again. In that post I have already explained why the Father was considered greater at that time, since the Son had humbled himself to come in the flesh and to be obedient to the Father unto death. However, after His acension to the right hand of power on high, the Son regained the glory He had at the beginning with the Father and the Holy Spirit and was highly exalted over everything and given all authority.
John 14:28 New International Version (NIV) 28 “You heard me say, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for (((((( the Father is greater than I.)))))))
John 14:28 King James Version (KJV) 28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ...[text shortened]... the points that say what the actual relationship is between Jesus and his father truly are.
Originally posted by galveston75I simply got fed up replying to the idea, same thing, over and over again, so any time a trinitarian cites a text supporting the idea, all we simply need to do is point them in the direction of this thread, saves us heaps of time 😀
Thanks for the hard work researching this info and posting it Robbie. It might help someone here at RHP but you know the regular trinity fooled posters will fight it no matter what you post with the incredibly clear info that discredits the unprovable trinity.
Originally posted by galveston75wow
John 14:28 New International Version (NIV) 28 “You heard me say, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for (((((( the Father is greater than I.)))))))
John 14:28 King James Version (KJV) 28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ...[text shortened]... the points that say what the actual relationship is between Jesus and his father truly are.
Originally posted by SuzianneYou are probably right on that. The Bible clearly does not teach the trinity but yet you and the others here cannot see that because Jehovah is not letting you. You know why? Because you do not want to see it as your hearts are not looking for the truth because you are satisfied to believe in man made pagan doctrines.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, freaking yeah, we get it already.
JWs are Unitarians. Cool. We get it. Can we all move on now?
You're not proving it to the rest of us, and all I get out of your numerous posts is a little insulted that you think my beliefs change with the wind.
Can YOU move on now?
Originally posted by galveston75Our Bible, or your man made pagan Bible, molded in the image of your own man made pagan doctrines?
You are probably right on that. The Bible clearly does not teach the trinity but yet you and the others here cannot see that because Jehovah is not letting you. You know why? Because you do not want to see it as your hearts are not looking for the truth because you are satisfied to believe in man made pagan doctrines.
Sorry that it happens but the Bible says it would...
Originally posted by SuzianneOh really. And which one exactly is pagan? If it exist please explain it and show the referances to it's pagan background?
Our Bible, or your man made pagan Bible, molded in the image of your own man made pagan doctrines?
Pot, kettle, black. You know.
Originally posted by galveston75You guys are really amazing to me.
Thanks for the hard work researching this info and posting it Robbie. It might help someone here at RHP but you know the regular trinity fooled posters will fight it no matter what you post with the incredibly clear info that discredits the unprovable trinity.
Originally posted by galveston75Whilst I don't agree with RJHinds on virtually anything, I think it's a bit rich you hassling him about using one scripture to support something when you do the same with your dangerous blood transfusion policy.
[b]You pick out 1 scripture and past it here that you think supports the whole trinity thing....