Go back
Was I forced to be a Christian for 25+ years?

Was I forced to be a Christian for 25+ years?

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
I said I can't think of any regular contributor here who produces nearly as many angry off-topic posts as Suzianne does. That's the only mention of "regular posters" I made. Of course I am a regular poster. But none of my posts are "angry", and 90% of them are on-topic. She cannot claim these things about her own posts.
So you did know what I was on about but pretended otherwise?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
You should ask her about what she believes.
I am asking you about what you said. Quit dodging.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
So you did know what I was on about but pretended otherwise?
You're now dodging the fact that I have addressed your own disingenuous insinuation. The last time I posted angrily was about 8 years ago on the Debates Forum. I think my on-topic v off-topic ratio is healthy.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
You're now dodging the fact that I have addressed your own disingenuous insinuation. The last time I posted angrily was about 8 years ago on the Debates Forum. I think my on-topic v off-topic ratio is healthy.
To me you seem angry all the time, so there you go. It's a matter of perspective.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I am asking you about what you said. Quit dodging.
You already have my answer. I raised with her the fact that she had remained silent for years on an issue she suddenly tackled divegeester for. But all I got was an angry, paranoid 'answer'. If you want to know what she believes, and how it is different from what divegeester believes, ask her, not me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
To me you seem angry all the time, so there you go. It's a matter of perspective.
Well, you have admitted you have the intellectual hard wiring of a teenager. SO perhaps you are a poor judge of adult situations. I am not angry at all. You can't find a single "angry" post that I have written on the Spirituality Forum. Robust, perhaps. Unkind, sometimes, yes. Relentless, undoubtedly. Inconvenient, plenty. But "angry", no.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
You already have my answer. I raised with her the fact that she had remained silent for years on an issue she suddenly tackled divegeester for. But all I got was an angry, paranoid 'answer'. If you want to know what she believes, and how it is different from what divegeester believes, ask her, not me.
The issue she tackled Divegeester on was predestination/Calvinism. What do you mean she remained silent on the issue for years? Have you not read her posts to Eladar on the topic?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
To me you seem angry all the time, so there you go. It's a matter of perspective.
It's a matter of perspective.

No, it's not. Your perspective cannot alter the spirit and mood in which my posts are offered. If you assume I am "angry all the time" then that is a matter of misjudgement and error, and not a valid perspective. 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
Well, you have admitted you have the intellectual hard wiring of a teenager. SO perhaps you are a poor judge of adult situations. I am not angry at all. You can't find a single "angry" post that I have written on the Spirituality Forum. Robust, perhaps. Unkind, sometimes, yes. Relentless, undoubtedly. Inconvenient, plenty. But "angry", no.
Intellectual hard wiring? There you go putting words in my mouth again.

The only poor judge here is you.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
[b]It's a matter of perspective.

No, it's not. Your perspective cannot alter the spirit and mood in which my posts are offered. If you assume I am "angry all the time" then that is a matter of misjudgement and error, and not a valid perspective. 😉[/b]
Let me guess because your opinion of yourself is the only universally correct one? Gee you can't even remain on the same side of the fence.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
The issue she tackled Divegeester on was predestination/Calvinism. What do you mean she remained silent on the issue for years? Have you not read her posts to Eladar on the topic?
No, not really. I was talking about her silence - to my knowledge - regarding the posters I actually listed, whom she has good relations with. She loathes Eladar. Most of Suzianne's posts addressing Eladar are Clans Forum style insults and smack downs. I don't pay much attention to them. By contrast, KellyJay's disputations and discourses with Eladar are more interesting.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Let me guess because your opinion of yourself is the only universally correct one?
I don't post "angry" comments. This reality is not something you are able to alter with your "perspective".

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
The only poor judge here is you.
This I shall call the Pantomime Rejoinder™

Google hits? No results found for "pantomime rejoinder".

😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
No, not really. I was talking about her silence - to my knowledge - regarding the posters I actually listed, whom she has good relations with. She loathes Eladar. Most of Suzianne's posts addressing Eladar are Clans Forum style insults and smack downs. I don't pay much attention to them. By contrast, KellyJay's disputations and discourses with Eladar are more interesting.
Maybe then you should pay a little more attention.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
I don't post "angry" comments. This reality is not something you are able to alter with your "perspective".
So you have a universally objective standard of what 'angry' should look like, i.e your subjective opinion?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.