Go back
Was I forced to be a Christian for 25+ years?

Was I forced to be a Christian for 25+ years?

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
This I shall call the Pantomime Rejoinder™

Google hits? No results found for "pantomime rejoinder".

😛
Wrong again.

https://www.google.ae/search?q=Pantomime+Rejoinder&oq=Pantomime+Rejoinder&aqs=chrome..69i57.1006j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Maybe then you should pay a little more attention.
Pay more attention to Suzianne Clans Foruming™ Eladar ? I don't think so.

Clans Foruming™ ~ Google hits: none.

I'm on a roll.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Wrong again.
You are mistaken.

No results found for "pantomime rejoinder".

At least until Google detects my minting of it!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
Pay more attention to Suzianne Clans Foruming™ Eladar ? I don't think so.

Clans Foruming™ ~ Google hits: none.

I'm on a roll.
This roll?

https://www.mediaite.com/food/breakfast-links-man-wearing-nothing-but-underwear-steals-bread-truck/

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
There may be more. I seem to be on a Vocabulary-Minting™ roll.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
...Vocabulary-Minting™
Yet another worldwide and all-time first!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
I said I can't think of any regular contributor here who produces nearly as many angry off-topic posts as Suzianne does. That's the only mention of "regular posters" I made. Of course I am a regular poster. But none of my posts are "angry", and 90% of them are on-topic. She cannot claim these things about her own posts.
angry

adjective
"feeling or showing strong annoyance, displeasure, or hostility"

About 90% of your posts show strong annoyance, displeasure, or hostility.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
angry

adjective
"feeling or showing strong annoyance, displeasure, or hostility"

About 90% of your posts show strong annoyance, displeasure, or hostility.
Then you are misjudging the motivation and mood that gives rise to my posts. I am not "angry" at all. It may seem that way to you, but it is a mistake on your part to imagine that I am actually angry. By contrast, I believe that Suzianne is actually angry when she writes a high proportion of her posts ~ and that message she sent me too ~ perhaps I am mistaken?

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Obviously not the ones addressed at you, for obvious reasons.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
Then you are misjudging the motivation and mood that gives rise to my posts. I am not "angry" at all. It may seem that way to you, but it is a mistake on your part to imagine that I am actually angry. By contrast, I believe that Suzianne is actually angry when she writes a high proportion of her posts ~ and that message she sent me too ~ perhaps I am mistaken?
Exactly my point. Maybe you too are mistaken that Suzianne is actually angry. That is just your perspective.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
According to your subjective opinion, maybe.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
About 90% of your posts show strong annoyance, displeasure, or hostility.
Then it is a misperception by you.

I am not annoyed. No one's ideas here cause me displeasure. And as for "hostility", well what I would say is about 90% of my posts show robustness, sometimes unkindness (but I'd argue it's of the 'sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind' sort], tenacity, on-topic inconvenience... and if this is perceived as "hostile" by the recipients then I simply have to accept that this is so and that their perception is valid. But it's certainly not a hostility rooted in anger. Far from it.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.