Originally posted by lemon limeI think he's being honest in his presentations.
I don't fault imperfections either, but I think it would be easier for him to solve p-vs-np than trying to explain how knowing without knowing is somehow able to trump knowing because of knowing.
[b]I don't doubt the honesty: reject the timing of the chorus.
If you don't mind my asking... whose honesty and which chorus?[/b]
I do feel that he's been confronted continually to be less defensive and more fortright, so I guess I would say that his timing in affecting honesty appears to be a step off.
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHinds"Please state your belief with a reference to an authoritative source in which you place your trust. Thanks." (OP)
I believe too many things to mention in one post. Read some of my posts in other threads and you should be able to figure it out. 😏
Nobody is asking you to state everything you believe in one post. Please select your beliefs one at a time.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
"Please state your belief with a reference to an authoritative source in which you place your trust. Thanks." (OP)
Nobody is asking you to state everything you believe in one post. Please select your beliefs one at a time.
I believe God created the heavens and the earth. (Genesis 1:1)
The Holy Bible is my authoritative source.
HalleluYaH !!! Praise the LORD! Holy! Holy! Holy!
Originally posted by twhiteheadOriginally posted by twhitehead
Does that mean:
Okay I am going to go and read your posts and try and understand them.
or
Okay, I am going to continue rudely ignoring what you have to say.
"No, it wont. Our disagreement has nothing to do with what I believe. Try reading my posts sometimes."
Okay.