- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmfUnlike Rajk999, I don't see you as robust and principled..
In the years I have been here Rajk999 has copped far more abuse than I've seen him hand out. I think my perspective goes a little deeper and relies on a longer period of observation than you. By your own definition of "troll", that's what you are. Unlike Rajk999, I don't see you as robust and principled, I just see you as an angry blowhard. Changing his name to "jark" makes you sound like a teenager.
What evidence can you provide here that Rajk999 is principled?
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @fmfI personally think the website should ban you. You’ve probably done more to discourage people from buying memberships here than anyone else - and by a country mile.
Do you want him to stop posting or, to the same end, do you want the website to ban him?
Your lying, trolling, OCD- and ADHD-fueled obnoxiousness, pseudo-intellectual pretentiousness and amorality all combine to make you not just a toxic presence in this community but a toxic person as well.
You’ve openly admitted your behavior here was so atrocious in the past that you were forced to write a community-wide apology AND apologize to this website’s owners. The old adage that a leopard doesn’t change its spots appears true with you, though. Your behavior hasn’t improved at all.
Originally posted by @divegeesterI shall permit it, yes.
Are we allowed to add others if we have already had one?
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
14 May 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterSomeone else said the universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it’s stranger than we can imagine, which kind of puts a damper on the first quote.
Imagination.
I think it was Einstein who said imagaination is more important than knowledge.
14 May 18
Originally posted by @fmfIt's not what I think of you, but what you think of yourself that's of importance, and that was the inference in the post I made that you just mischaracterized.
It's OK if you think of me as irrelevant and of no importance but it's interesting to note the peculiarly high proportion of your posts that are addressed to me.
Go add them up. You address my posts 3 to 1, but to Rajk's post, which you claim are more interesting, rarely.
From where I sit it appears that your reluctance to engage the troll is rooted in fear and apprehension of the kind of mindless exchange that would ensue with a bitter, hateful, judgmental, condemning, narrow minded, spiteful and ignorant hypocrite.
It would be better for you to stay in your comfort zone and attack the children and give the beast a pass.
Originally posted by @secondsonI think Rajk999 makes valuable, clear and fascinating contributions to this community and enhances its diversity of ideas and beliefs. Meanwhile you're not impressed by me and I'm not impressed by you. It's OK.
It's not what I think of you, but what you think of yourself that's of importance, and that was the inference in the post I made that you just mischaracterized.
Go add them up. You address my posts 3 to 1, but to Rajk's post, which you claim are more interesting, rarely.
From where I sit it appears that your reluctance to engage the troll is rooted ...[text shortened]... e better for you to stay in your comfort zone and attack the children and give the beast a pass.
Originally posted by @secondsonI don't think he is a "beast" nor is he a bitter, hateful, judgmental, condemning, narrow minded, spiteful and ignorant hypocrite. He makes his case for his interpretation of the Bible better than you do for yours.
From where I sit it appears that your reluctance to engage the troll is rooted in fear and apprehension of the kind of mindless exchange that would ensue with a bitter, hateful, judgmental, condemning, narrow minded, spiteful and ignorant hypocrite.
14 May 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterOriginally posted by @rajk999
No he won’t, and saying he will be is a lie by you.
"You are going to be cast into the eternal fire for preaching that".
Rajk preaches and teaches the doctrine of condemnation because he fails to recognize the truth of the gospel of the grace of God.
Rajk probably thinks he has some kind of apostolic authority based on how pleased God must be with all his good works.
14 May 18
Originally posted by @fmfI take it you are a disciple of the troll then.
I don't think he is a "beast" nor is he a bitter, hateful, judgmental, condemning, narrow minded, spiteful and ignorant hypocrite. He makes his case for his interpretation of the Bible better than you do for yours.
You obviously share with him belief in the doctrine of condemnation which comprises virtually 100% of all his posts.
"He makes his case for his interpretation of the Bible better than you do for yours."
You got that right. It's his interpretation.
I, on the other hand, don't interpret the scriptures. They quite clearly interpret themselves.
You know he's lying, yet you defend his lies. Your bitterness against Jesus must go deep indeed.