Originally posted by @romans1009Yes, this: My loss of faith was a gradual process of reflection that resulted in me realizing that I no longer believed the claims that Christians make about themselves and about the meaning of Jesus' life, and consequently I stopped self-identifying as a Christian and now self-identify as a non-Christian and an agnostic atheist.
“100% clear?”
It's 100% clear. It is not a lie. Nor have I lied about it.
Originally posted by @romans1009No, I am not lying about why I am no longer a Christian.
But you’ve definitely been lying - and lying repeatedly - about why you are no longer a Christian.
Originally posted by @fmfOnce your initial explanation was exposed as being absurd, you lied in claiming not to have said it. You then tried to revise it and claim the revisions were the original explanation. Having failed at that lie, you’re now going back to the original and claiming it means what it clearly and obviously doesn’t mean.
No, I am not lying about why I am no longer a Christian.
Bad (or sick) guy!
You’re a bad hombre!
Originally posted by @romans1009My original explanation was fine. It was cogent, it was succinct, it said all it needed to say. It was not intended to be a list of Christian beliefs. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the initial explanation and I have not lied about what it clearly means since posting it.
Once your initial explanation was exposed as being absurd, you lied in claiming not to have said it. You then tried to revise it and claim the revisions were the original explanation. Having failed at that lie, you’re now going back to the original and claiming it means what it clearly and obviously doesn’t mean.
Bad (or sick) guy!
You’re a bad hombre!
Originally posted by @romans1009I have been telling the truth all along.
But you’ve definitely been lying - and lying repeatedly - about why you are no longer a Christian.
Originally posted by @romans1009Your fake bonhomie is not going to disguise your silliness on this thread.
Bad (or sick) guy! You’re a bad hombre!
Originally posted by @fmfExposing Ghost was easy after he made the mistake of trying to answer basic theological questions.
Romans1009 has reached his foetal position.
Exposing you was more difficult because when you’re trying to obfuscate, which is often, you write these vague, mealy-mouthed sentences that can mean just about anything.
But your mistake in trying to hide in ambiguity is eventually the smoke clears and your carefully-crafted, nebulous, lawyerly - and ultimately meaningless - assertions fall apart under the slightest questioning.
No wonder you keep saying you don’t want to discuss it. You’d rather keep the smoke heavy and thick.
Originally posted by @fmfExposing you wasn’t easy because when you’re trying to obfuscate, which is often, you write these vague, mealy-mouthed sentences that can mean just about anything.
My original explanation was fine. It was cogent, it was succinct, it said all it needed to say. It was not intended to be a list of Christian beliefs. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the initial explanation and I have not lied about what it clearly means since posting it.
But your mistake in trying to hide in ambiguity is eventually the smoke clears and your carefully-crafted, nebulous, lawyerly - and ultimately meaningless - assertions fall apart under the slightest questioning.
No wonder you keep saying you don’t want to discuss it. You’d rather keep the smoke heavy and thick.