Originally posted by Badwater
Contentment? Inner peace? Boy it's hard to argue that anyone would be more content than a buddhist. I'd be a buddhist if I didn't have huge problems with karma and reincarnation, but I do use a lot of buddhist ideas, thought, and social action. I also subscribe to some buddhist quarterlies; I like their mental approach to life.
Take a walk on the Zen side. Leave the metaphysics behind.
All this “I would be a Buddhist, but...”; “I would be a Christian, but...”; etc., etc. Neither dismiss the forms because they can’t be anything but forms, nor adhere to any form uncritically.
I wasted a lot of time searching for the “right “ form. Then I wasted a lot of time being disgruntled because every form I tried had all the limitations of being just—a form. Now, I just speak in terms of whatever form I find helpful at the moment, in whatever given context.
All religious language is either iconographic or idolatrous. It is as misguided to judge the territory according to the map as it is to dismiss all maps because they are—in the end—only limited in their ability to “define” the territory. Maps can be useful; they can also be traps.
The
referent precedes every
sign that is applied to describe, circumscribe, conceptualize, or just point to it.
Whenever someone says, “I am a _________”; they are usually naming the map they adhere to, nothing more. Whenever someone says, “I am not a _______ ”; they are just rejecting that map. Maps are just functional. They are (in the context of spirituality here) just ways of thinking. Reality is prior to how we think about it, prior to the names (God, Brahman, Tao), symbols and categories we use to describe it.
Some people find this map more useful—in terms of getting to the territory; others find that map more useful. The fault is not really with the maps, but with how people apply them—or, rather, with how some people insist on their map as the only “right” one.
If I cite from map X, people think I’m an “X-ist”; if I cite from map Y, they think I’m a “Y-ist.” I have spent far too much time saying things like, “I am
not a Z-ist!”
At the moment—in the limited context of writing posts for an internet forum—I am whatever I am saying.
So, don't really take a walk on the "Zen" side: take a walk in the territory. Then say whatever you want... 🙂