Originally posted by FMF
Page 7 of this thread:
[b]"However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves lik hings in context considered.
However, I understand why he feels he has to defend slavery.
However, I understand why he feels he has to defend slavery.
[/b]
Umm. When I was in FIFTH grade an assignment from the teacher was that we should list out family tree back as far as we could.
I learned that as an African American embarressingly enough, I could not go back too far because all my ancestors were probably American SLAVES. That was a painful experience for a young fifth grade black boy to go through in a mostly white school.
Right! I am really eager to defend slavery - NOT.
No, I am not interested in defending slavery. I am interested in a intellectually honest approach to the word which has a modern connotation of extreme negativity.
Just the mention of "slave" and some people cannot appreciate that there are different types of servitude.
I have no problem with recognizing that strong Abolitionist activism came from Methodist, Quaker, and Mennonite Christian sects. They used the Bible to fight against slavery. And I happen to agree with their exegesis.
Now we come to the matter of slavery mentioned in the Old Testament. Let's look at it in detail and not in a knee jerk emotional reaction simply to exploit the modern negative connotation of the word.
That is all.