Originally posted by FMF Why would the "education" about the utter abomination of slavery need to be "gradual"? Why wasn't it included in an "Eleven Commandments"?
Why would the "education" about the utter abomination of slavery need to be "gradual"? Why wasn't it included in an "Eleven Commandments"?
Do you think that dept servitude is an abomination ?
If a man had no means to pay a debt but agreed to work off the value of what was owed, is that an abomination to you ?
I am not sure that indentured servitude is always an abomination. It is unfortunate. If you disagree, spend some time to explain why the practice of dept servitude is an abomination.
In terms of the religion (as espoused in the relevant holy books before 'interpretation'😉 they are about par, Sharia law being pretty similar to Mosaic law, and both espousing slavery and genocide.
[b]*Helping Runaway Slaves in the Old Testament*
Deuteronomy 23:15-16 - "You shall not deliver to his master the slave ...[text shortened]... en put to death and kidnapping would have not been prohibited among the covenant people.
I believe you could only have a slave to repay the debt he owed and even
then there was a maximum number of years that he could be held in
slavery before he had to be set free.
Why would the "education" about the utter abomination of slavery need to be "gradual"? Why wasn't it included in an "Eleven Commandments"?
Do you think that dept servitude is an abomination ?
If a man had no means to pay a debt but agreed to work off the value of what was owed, is that an [b]abomination to you ?
I am ...[text shortened]... isagree, spend some time to explain why the practice of dept servitude is an abomination.[/b]
working off a debt is not the same as being owned property of another person. the hebrews had debt servitude to other hebrews, but those captured in their barbaric rampage across the middle east were enslaved.
Originally posted by FMF I certainly do not. Their victims go on the 'Islam killing' side of the scorecard, clearly. So, will you answer I wonder: are you saying that all the Muslims killed by Christians during the nine Crusades should be chalked up on the 'Islam killing' side of the scorecard?
I was not there to keep score. But I would say they brought it on themselves.
You reap what you sow.
Originally posted by FMF Let's just stick to "slavery". This is the issue I have raised with you. Do you think slavery is an abomination?
Let's just stick to "slavery". This is the issue I have raised with you. Do you think slavery is an abomination?
I would rather be specific and appreciate the nuances of the problem.
I would rather be realistic and acknowledge that as much as my modern humanistic revulsion is at the very word "SLAVERY" I would rather be mature intellectually about it. This includes the realization that "slavery" has a number of different manifestations.
I think some are far worse than others. And I have no vested interest just to have a knee jerk prejudice of accusing God of condoning slavery in its more evil manifestations.
Originally posted by VoidSpirit working off a debt is not the same as being owned property of another person. the hebrews had debt servitude to other hebrews, but those captured in their barbaric rampage across the middle east were enslaved.
Originally posted by RJHinds ...I would say they brought it on themselves.
So? Are you suggesting that the Muslim civilian victims of the Crusades were victims of Muslim military forces or victims of Christian military forces? Just be clear.
Originally posted by jaywill I would rather be specific and appreciate the nuances of the problem.
I would rather be [b]realistic and acknowledge that as much as my modern humanistic revulsion is at the very word "SLAVERY" I would rather be mature intellectually about it. This includes the realization that "slavery" has a number of different manifestations.[/b]
Do you think slavery is an abomination - "realistically" and "intellectually" - yes or no?
Originally posted by FMF So? Are you suggesting that the Muslim civilian victims of the Crusades were victims of Muslim military forces or victims of Christian military forces? Just be clear.
I said I was not there to keep score and neither was you. I was only giving
a general principle.