24 Aug '09 18:50>3 edits
Originally posted by robbie carrobie================================
all scripture is inspired of God end beneficial for setting things straight, so that the man of God may be fully competent, equipped for very good work - 2 Timothy 3:16,17
all scripture is inspired of God end beneficial for setting things straight, so that the man of God may be fully competent, equipped for very good work - 2 Timothy 3:16,17
================================
Thank you. Thank you. I also believe that.
I did not mean that the book of Ecclesiastes is not inspired or not profitable. I mean the revelation of the Bible is progressive.
Solomon was very wise. He says in essence what you find to do in life do it heartily because when you die its is all over. Now no one can argue with that. There is no knowledge of fulfilling your ambition in death to which we all are going, unless Christ comes first.
So if you are about a skill or profession, do it well and do it with knowledge. When you croak you won't be doing that any more.
I am just saying we have to put Ecclesiastes in its proper perspective. I am not going to use Ecclesiastes to elevate it over the Gospel of Luke. In Luke we are told of the consciousness of the rich man and of the begger Lazarus. If Jesus had wanted to refer to Ecclesiastes that neither the rich man nor Lazarus was aware of anything after they died, He would have.
Jesus Christ did not appeal to "no knowledge" written by Solomon. The account in Luke 16:19-31 is probably not a "parable" because in NO parable that I can recall did Jesus refer to a person by NAME.
It reads to me like something which He saw, was aware that had happened. I do not need to know ALL the details. I do not need to be able to explain exactly WHEN it occurred. I am convinced that the teaching is about something which actually happened to someone with a specific name - Lazarus.
The whole teaching of Luke 16:19-31 is a warning to the rich. Christ could have said that in Hades there is no knowledge and no activity and everyone who has died is totally oblivious to everything because their souls are non-existent similar to what Solomon taught.
HE DID NOT DO THAT.
So I will not be using Ecclesiastes to trump what He did teach there in Luke. Rather I think we should let Luke 16:19-31 rise above the Ecclesiastes passage that there is no knowledge in the grave.
This to me is like saying "money is the answer to everything" in Ecclesiastes is a more final word than "you cannot serve God and mammon" in the Gospels.
Context - in the progressive revelation is important to me.