11 Dec '05 12:25>
For all of you that think of gravity as a universal law. Theres proof otherwise http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/p67.htm its a good read i recomend it
Originally posted by lukemcmullanThat's because, if you look at the picture of Einstein writing 'LOL' and the fact that it's from a site about intelligent design, the article is intended as a parody of creationist attacks on evolution, not as an actual attack on the theory of gravity.
Does the moon not go around the Earth? The reason it's more affected by the Earth than the Sun is because it's closer to the Earth, I thought.
Also, that passage questions the idea that the moon rotates on its axis and yet the same side always faces the Earth...uh, think about it!
"In fact, it is known that the flux of photons from the sun and ...[text shortened]... h someone has come up with based on half-remembered school lessons and a total lack of research.
Originally posted by Will EverittOne thing I noticed about this so-called scientific article is one
For all of you that think of gravity as a universal law. Theres proof otherwise http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/p67.htm its a good read i recomend it
Originally posted by sonhouseSatire - a narrative where irony and exaggeration are used for a humorous portrayal.
One thing I noticed about this so-called scientific article is one
factoid it got totally wrong: It says emphatically gravity does
not explain why Saturn has rings and Jupiter does not.
In fact Jupiter has rings, not as glorious as Saturn but the recent
probes going past have hit it from the right angle to image them.
This piece is another attempt by t ...[text shortened]... on gravity, they should stick to their area of expertise,
their pseudo-science of creationism.
Originally posted by Bad wolfSatire - a narrative where irony and exaggeration are used for a humorous portrayal.
The article is filled with flaus:
For example.
"The theory of gravity violates common sense in many ways. Adherents have a hard time explaining, for instance, why airplanes do not fall. Since anti-gravity is rejected by the scientific establishment, they resort to lots of hand-waving. The theory, if taken seriously, implies that the default position for ...[text shortened]... ue research into what the author is talking about there are plenty of mistakes, errors and lies.
Originally posted by telerionSo, you and Xanthoz are both proponents of the Theory of Intelligent Falling, eh? How fascinating.
I have certainly questioned gravity. There are just too many holes in it and things it can't explain. Ask a physicist when the last time was that they directly observed a "graviton." This is supposed to be science not history class. You have to directly observe it.
And to think some people actually claim gravity has more support than evolution.
Originally posted by XanthosNZA literary style lost on most.
Satire - a narrative where irony and exaggeration are used for a humorous portrayal.
Parody:
- a composition that imitates somebody's style in a humorous way
- make a spoof of or make fun of
- humorous or satirical mimicry
Originally posted by HalitoseShame.
A literary style lost on most.
Originally posted by Will EverittShame.
Shame.
I must point out that the authour has a degree in physics. More then anything I think its rather clear its satire when you read "The core idea of to each according to his weight, from each according to his mass is communist"