Originally posted by FMFso you like to conduct experiments on us. π΅
Yes, my interest lies in both the content and conduct of contributors and how each affect each other. lemon lime, for example, has offered virtually no content over the last few pages because he is intent on conducting himself in a certain way. Grampy Bobby, on the other hand, when his content does not get the response he wants ~ and gets called on it ~ he start ...[text shortened]... self in certain way. On a message board like this, content and conduct seem inextricably linked.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNot at all. I am interested in the issues discussed here and have been around for the best part of a decade. I have come to realize that religious people get more bent out of shape by inconvenient questions than they do by the kind of as hominems that they themselves dish out. I am just participating like anyone else. Was your 'divegeester feels the same degree of hate as people who used to murder black people after church' thing a week or so ago, was that you participating in good faith or did you see yourself as experimenting?
so you like to conduct experiments on us. π΅
Originally posted by FMFLOL
How did you and RJHinds resolve this issue? Did you decide that divegeester DOES deserve to burn in "Hell" for his "sins" and for not believing in a torturer God, or that he DOESN'T?
Maybe the title of this thread should have been:
Why are some Christians amused when under attack?
Or maybe this...
Why is FMF bemused when Christians are amused?