Originally posted by divegeesterGrampy Bobby does believe in the ghastly eternal torture ideology but also likes to demonstrate his unctuous self-anointed largess by conferring irreversible eternal salvation upon those who believe in Christ even just 'for a moment', and even if they subsequently don't believe in Him at all.
I think Grampy Bobby probably agrees with Hinds but is concerned about how he will appear aligning his RHP online persona with such a forum pariah as RJHinds and over such a horrible doctrine and in accusation of another Christian.
19 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesterI prefer to think of you residing in Mississippi lynching people for your satisfaction. 😵
Yes I'm currently enjoying a reprisal of the "brimstones R us" love from my fellow American Christians. Now you have joined in, we can get done to my status as antichrist and son of the devil.
19 Apr 15
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeesterIf by faith alone in Christ alone you've placed your trust in Him, the Holy Spirit imputed a human spirit at that moment of your regeneration [spiritual birth]; there's nothing a member of Christ's Royal Family can do to alter that relationship.
You seem to see yourself as a sort of "pastor" here. It's a pity your shepherding amounts to no more than avoiding challenging topics and copy/pasting various scriptures and your own posts, supplemented by a seasoning of impractical platitudes.
19 Apr 15
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeTruth. Although I thought Luke was a closet gay.
From my perspective as a Jedi knight, Luke Skywalker is our only hope, he is the only place we will have lasting control over the force,the world that has us at odds with the Emperor, Darth Vader and his minions.
(Sarcasm, not derision).
19 Apr 15
1 edit
Originally posted by Grampy BobbySo what do you think of one Christian telling another Christian they "deserve to burn in hell"? .. For eternity no less...
If by faith alone in Christ alone you've placed your trust in Him, the Holy Spirit imputed a human spirit at that moment of your regeneration [spiritual birth]; there's nothing a member of Christ's Royal Family can do to alter that relationship.
Originally posted by divegeesterOriginally posted by divegeester
So what do you think of one Christian telling another Christian they "deserve to burn in hell"? .. For eternity no less...
"So what do you think of one Christian telling another Christian they "deserve to burn in hell"? .. For eternity no less..."
If you're a believer in Christ, divegeester, quietly ignore any and all false statements made about you and/or your family members by others in your periphery; and pray for them. "29 Let no unwholesome word proceed from your mouth, but only such a word as is good for edification according to the need of the moment, so that it will give grace to those who hear. 30 Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption. 31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice. 32 Be kind to one another, tender-hearted, forgiving each other, just as God in Christ also has forgiven you." (Ephesians 4:29-32) / "JS, thanks for your insightful comments on the role the "online disinhibition effect" plays and for your kind words. In the context of the brevity of life on planet earth I choose to give the benefit of doubt, forgive and forget and move on. -Bob" Thread 163726 [Page 2]
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby"29 Let no unwholesome word proceed from your mouth, but only such a word as is good for edification according to the need of the moment, so that it will give grace to those who hear. 30 Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption. 31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice. [/i] (Ephesians 4:29-31)
So are you finally suggesting that RJHinds' words are "unwholesome", that they contain "bitterness" and "wrath" and "slander" and "malice"? Is that what your chosen copy paste is telling divegeester?
Originally posted by FMFNo I am making a reference to a white person in a film, that being Paul Newman, have you never seen Cool Hand Luke? Oh dear it seems that in your ardour to land a blow you have overlooked the rather obvious, how very sad for you. Paul Newman was white last time I looked, was he not? He stated to the man with no eyes (also white) that he was shakin the bush boss when relieving himself prior to making an escape attempt (he rather ingenuously attached a string to the bush which he pulled) He was not black at the time or even afterwards.
You're trying to make some kind of ad hominem joke out of black people being lynched?
It seem that in your ardour to land a blow your assumption that I was making a joke out of lynching is rather unfounded then again I have no problem seeing divesgeester as a southern plantation owner capable of lynching. Infact after reading about three hours worth of references I understand just how it became acceptable and I am willing to state that a self satisfied moral degenerate like you, in that environment, under those same circumstances may also have tolerated it. How does that grab you.
19 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo I am making a reference to a white person in a film, that being Paul Newman, have you never seen Cool Hand Luke? Oh dear it seems that in your ardour to land a blow you have overlooked the rather obvious, how very sad for you. Paul Newman was white last time I looked, was he not? He stated to the man with no eyes (also white) that he was shakin the bush boss when relieving himself prior to making an escape attempt (he rather ingenuously attached a string to the bush which he pulled) He was not black at the time or even afterwards.
It seem that in your ardour to land a blow your assumption that I was making a joke out of lynching is rather unfounded then again I have no problem seeing divesgeester as a southern plantation owner capable of lynching. Infact after reading about three hours worth of references I understand just how it became acceptable and I am willing to state that a self satisfied moral degenerate like you, in that environment, under those same circumstances may also have tolerated it. How does that grab you.
So "yes boss, no boss, shakin the bush boss" along with your earlier comment addressed to divegeester... "I prefer to think of you residing in Mississippi lynching people for your satisfaction" ...was not intended as a joke; you were being serious?