-Removed-im dumbfounded at the levels of blind stupidity. im not sure we should even justify their bizarre logic by engaging with them. trying to say blood has done more bad than good has made it clear just how far from reality they are. its frightening that people can be so far gone.
Originally posted by stellspalfiesoo lets get this your friend gets into a car drunk and proceeds to drive it, causes an accident that requires a blood transfusion and here you are debating whether to engage us in discussion because we are too stupid. We dont get drunk, we dont drive cars while drunk and we dont need blood transfusions as a consequence and we are the stupid ones, wow.
im dumbfounded at the levels of blind stupidity. im not sure we should even justify their bizarre logic by engaging with them. trying to say blood has done more bad than good has made it clear just how far from reality they are. its frightening that people can be so far gone.
Do us and yourself a favour and desist from engaging with us, obviously your friend is a genius, talk to him instead.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour inability to read is extraordinary. Stellspalfie said his friend was hit by a drunk driver, not that he was driving a car whilst drunk. 😞
soo lets get this your friend gets into a car drunk and proceeds to drive it, causes an accident that requires a blood transfusion and here you are debating whether to engage us in discussion because we are too stupid. We dont get drunk, we dont drive cars while drunk and we dont need blood transfusions as a consequence and we are the stupid ones, w ...[text shortened]... favour and desist from engaging with us, obviously your friend is a genius, talk to him instead.
my friend was hit by a drunk driver at high speed in leeds city center a few years ago....
Keep up.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiemy friend was hit by a drunk driver at high speed in leeds city center a few years ago, he had life saving surgery and lost a lot of blood.......should his parents have said no to the blood because of the small risk of infection? posted by me.
soo lets get this your friend gets into a car drunk and proceeds to drive it, causes an accident that requires a blood transfusion and here you are debating whether to engage us in discussion because we are too stupid. We dont get drunk, we dont drive cars while drunk and we dont need blood transfusions as a consequence and we are the stupid ones, w ...[text shortened]... favour and desist from engaging with us, obviously your friend is a genius, talk to him instead.
this is how you change it -
soo lets get this your friend gets into a car drunk and proceeds to drive it, causes an accident that requires a blood transfusion and here you are debating whether to engage us in discussion because we are too stupid. We dont get drunk, we dont drive cars while drunk robbie.
look how the story has been warped by your crazy brain. this is why its impossible to have any serious dialogue with you.
Originally posted by Proper Knobdo you think it was an honest mistake? after re-reading his post, im starting to suspect his error was not accidental.
Your inability to read is extraordinary. Stellspalfie said his friend was hit by a drunk driver, not that he was driving a car whilst drunk. 😞my friend was hit by a drunk driver at high speed in leeds city center a few years ago....
Keep up.
for all the ill-educated idiots out there. heres some stats for tti's in the u.k. (transfusion transmitted infections).
"There have been no reported confirmed transfusion-transmitted viral or parasitic infections since 2005,"
http://www.hpa.org.uk/Topics/InfectiousDiseases/InfectionsAZ/BIBD/EpidemiologicalData/bibd015SurveillanceofTTI/
here's some more stats from the nhs,
The risk estimates in the UK, 2010-2011
The risk that a donation entering the UK blood supply was a potentially infectious HBV, HCV or HIV
donation (over the two year period 2010-2011) was estimated. Based on these estimates, assuming
2.5 million donations per year in the UK, we would expect testing did not identify approximately two
HBV infectious donations every year, one HCV every ten years, and one HIV every two to three
years. The estimated risk for HCV has shown an increase in calculations made in recent years
because of an increased number of seroconversions detected among established donors since 2010.
There has not been a confirmed viral transfusion transmitted infection (TTI) reported in Serious
Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) since 2005.
http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1317136707628
the above link is a pdf file covering all potential blood donation risks, from the blood screened to the blood used. im sure the likes of the j.w's would want to make sure they have fully formed well rounded informed opinions. so im pretty confident they will be reading the whole document.
Originally posted by stellspalfiei have nothing to say to you, we claim the right of self determination on the basis of principles that to us are sacrosanct and of which you have little knowledge of and even less respect and for that you call us idiots and are too stupid for you to condescend to continue dialogue with, fine, suits me, you will be doing me a favour, i wouldn't take that kind of insult to my face and i am certainly not taking it from you, cya.
he wont say anymore because his silly 'blood infection' argument falls apart when placed in a real scenario like somebody bleeding out, with minutes to live.