Why do atheists care. [rhet]

-Removed-

It's difficult to communicate well with someone determined to misunderstand what you write, and doesn't understand the meaning of the words you use.

-Removed-

I didn't call you an idiot, I said you were acting like one, which anyone can do from time to time.
Acting like one on an ongoing basis is however grounds for an upgrade from 'acting like'
to simply 'idiot'. We haven't 'quite' got there yet.

And I didn't admit to miscommunication, I admitted to being misunderstood.
The difference being who I regard as being at fault.

Guess which one of us I think that is. 😀

And I capitalise for emphasis, as opposed to increased 'coherence'. Which is generally why people capitalise stuff.

-Removed-

I understood what he said perfectly with no problems at all.

This suggests that what he said was not unclear.

You are just in too high dudgeon to read things properly.

-Removed-

You seem to lack any intellectual honesty at all. Do you now admit that I did not admit to what you claimed I admitted to. Withdraw the claim and admit you didn't read my post very carefully and I will withdraw the accusation of lying. Instead what I see is you trying to pin your failure to read on me. What was incoherent about my correction? Which sentence did you not understand?

-Removed-

Try answering the questions I asked:

Lets go through this again. Read this carefully and answer all questions honestly. If I say 'reporters frequently use catchy headlines to gain viewers'. Am I or am I not claiming that all reporters do so? In my opinion, clearly the sentence is ambiguous but it is reasonable to assume that not all reporters are implied.
Secondly, if I then say 'as an example of this, reporter A used catchy headline B'. Am I or am I not saying that:
1. my example proves the claim.
2. my claim is based solely on the example.
3. my claim is a generalization based on the example.

-Removed-

And I have admitted my mistake and not asked you to take responsibility for it. That you are stating that you are not responsible here suggests either you are attempting a time wasting tactic or you misunderstood my post (something you seem extremely good at to the point of it seeming deliberate)

if you want to clarify what you meant, go back copy all the posts, my replies, your replies to my replies and at each juncture explain where you went wrong, how I misinterpreted your misunderstanding and them we can start again. Bring a dictionary this time. And underline any word you are not sure about.
I have no need to clarify. You claimed I was incoherent in my admission that I misunderstood the word and used that as an excuse for your false accusation that I had agreed that you were correct from the beginning. If you claim I was incoherent it is up to you to explain where i was incoherent, not up to me to go back through the whole thread. Again, I suspect time wasting tactics.

-Removed-

Why are you refusing to answer my questions? Will it expose your guilt?