why do i believe in god

Originally posted by tim88
The big bang?

in that temperature anything could bond -?- but what in the hell could do ? such a reaction???----Nothing we know today could produce so much heat?-

if those conditions still existed today, we would be seeing big and little bangs all over the place.

correction, we would not be seeing anything at all because we would not be here.

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
if those conditions still existed today, we would be seeing big and little bangs all over the place.

correction, we would not be seeing anything at all because we would not be here.

And did you come up with that all by yourself? exceptional buffoon!

Originally posted by tim88
And did you come up with that all by yourself? exceptional buffoon!

For someone who evidently has no idea what they are talking about and who has trouble
constructing even vaguely coherent sentences on the subject I would be careful who I called
a buffoon if I were you.

I see nothing wrong with what VoidSpirit said based on our current understanding of the
laws of physics.

Something of which he evidently knows a heck of a lot more about than you.

Originally posted by googlefudge
For someone who evidently has no idea what they are talking about and who has trouble
constructing even vaguely coherent sentences on the subject I would be careful who I called
a buffoon if I were you.

I see nothing wrong with what VoidSpirit said based on our current understanding of the
laws of physics.

Something of which he evidently knows a heck of a lot more about than you.

What makes you think VoidSpirit knows more about the first and second law
of thermodynamicis than I do? I have already proved my knowledge of those
laws and I say VoidSpirit is wrong.

Originally posted by RJHinds
What makes you think VoidSpirit knows more about the first and second law
of thermodynamicis than I do? I have already proved my knowledge of those
laws and I say VoidSpirit is wrong.

Because I know the laws of thermodynamics and unlike you I understand them.

You have proven time and time again you have no clue what you are talking about.

You have proven your knowledge of these subjects... you don't have any.

You are ignorant of their meaning or deliberately and intentionally lie about their meaning.

I and others have explained why many times before and I see no point in doing so again
because you wont pay any attention this time either.


You are wrong, in so many ways on so many levels.

Your word has no authority and no noticeable truth value.

Originally posted by RJHinds
What makes you think VoidSpirit knows more about the first and second law
of thermodynamicis than I do? I have already proved my knowledge of those
laws and I say VoidSpirit is wrong.

Is it posited that the 1st and 2nd LOTs are descriptive of what was happening before so-called Planck time, or are we talking about the post- Planck regime?

Originally posted by JS357
Is it posited that the 1st and 2nd LOTs are descriptive of what was happening before so-called Planck time, or are we talking about the post- Planck regime?

I only know about NOW.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

I do not cheat by having more than one account like you and others do. And I
also am not ashamed to use my real name either like you and others. And I am
not ashamed of the gospel of Christ.

if i was rj i would sue you all for defamation of character by saying he is chatting - AND WIN!

Originally posted by tim88
if i was rj i would sue you all for defamation of character by saying he is chatting - AND WIN!

You support RJHinds, you seem interested in the accusations of cheating surrounding him, you share the same faith, you often post here at Spirituality, you have played some of the people who post here; one wonders why you haven't played RJHinds at chess.

Originally posted by FMF
You support RJHinds, you seem interested in the accusations of cheating surrounding him, you share the same faith, you often post here at Spirituality, you have played some of the people who post here; one wonders why you haven't played RJHinds at chess.

you have my permission to ask the site where i'm from - australia

Originally posted by tim88
you have my permission to ask the site where i'm from - australia

Have you looked at Thread 145363?