1. Joined
    31 Aug '06
    Moves
    40565
    22 Nov '14 08:37
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Or maybe the talking out his ass scene.
    You have to admit that putting the most precious parts of the male body in a flapping bag of skin, is like the procreative version of russian roulette.

    It looks more like a good enough system that co-evolved with fixes added as time went by.
  2. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    23 Nov '14 06:02
    Originally posted by C Hess
    You have to admit that putting the most precious parts of the male body in a flapping bag of skin, is like the procreative version of russian roulette.

    It looks more like a good enough system that co-evolved with fixes added as time went by.
    There is no evidence that the male and female sex organs for all animals, including mankind, have undergone any fixes from the time of the original creation. So there is no evolution to be seen there. Just accept it and believe unto salvation.
  3. Joined
    31 Aug '06
    Moves
    40565
    23 Nov '14 11:33
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    There is no evidence that the male and female sex organs for all animals, including mankind, have undergone any fixes from the time of the original creation. So there is no evolution to be seen there. Just accept it and believe unto salvation.
    The evolutionary history of testicular externalization and the origin of the scrotum:

    www.ias.ac.in/jbiosci/mar2010/27.pdf
  4. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    23 Nov '14 21:10
    Originally posted by C Hess
    The evolutionary history of testicular externalization and the origin of the scrotum:

    www.ias.ac.in/jbiosci/mar2010/27.pdf
    Speculation is not evidence. 😏
  5. Joined
    31 Aug '06
    Moves
    40565
    24 Nov '14 08:13
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Speculation is not evidence. 😏
    The "speculation" in question is built on evidence. You said there were no evidence. The link (be it an hypothesis) demonstrate that you're wrong about that. There may not be sufficient evidence to rule out all other possible hypotheses, but there's enough to know our scrotums have evolved through various fixes.

    Unless, of course, your god really does suck at poker. Perhaps that's why it doesn't like gambling? Hm.
  6. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    24 Nov '14 22:18
    Originally posted by C Hess
    The "speculation" in question is built on evidence. You said there were no evidence. The link (be it an hypothesis) demonstrate that you're wrong about that. There may not be sufficient evidence to rule out all other possible hypotheses, but there's enough to know our scrotums have evolved through various fixes.

    Unless, of course, your god really does suck at poker. Perhaps that's why it doesn't like gambling? Hm.
    Like I said that is not evidence. At best, it is speculation based on vivid imaginations.
  7. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    25 Nov '14 00:03
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Like I said that is not evidence. At best, it is speculation based on vivid imaginations.
    At best, YOUR imagination is based on YOUR speculations. You do no real science, you only are bent on destroying sciences. The thing is, we, ALL of us know that full well. So why do you continue on this vagrant course?

    That would be because you have no other choice, having self lobomomized yourself decades ago and can no longer think for yourself but only parrot politically based pseudo-science BS video's that have no science truth to tell, only political pandering to weak minds looking for votes with the objective of Iranization of the US, the closing of the idea of separation of church and state.

    You are desperate for the dissolution of the separation of church and state and THAT is your motivation for your failed attempt to kill science. If you manage to kill evolution you would indirectly be responsible for killing ALL science since they all use EXACTLY the same logic to go from point A to point B.

    But in your desperation, you will use ANY ruse, ANY BS Pseudoscience video that the authors KNOW cannot be presented to a legitimate science journal so they stoop to BS video's to sway weak minded voters so THEY can be the dictators of what would then pass for science and the US would become the laughing stock of the world and Brazil and China will be doing the real future work of REAL science.

    If you have a victory, and I sincerely hope the NEVER happens, in fact, am 99% sure it won't, if it does, CHOKE on your pathetic victory.
  8. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    25 Nov '14 05:51
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    At best, YOUR imagination is based on YOUR speculations. ....if it does, CHOKE on your pathetic victory.
    Don't beat about the bush Sonhouse. 😉
  9. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    25 Nov '14 06:09
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    At best, YOUR imagination is based on YOUR speculations. You do no real science, you only are bent on destroying sciences. The thing is, we, ALL of us know that full well. So why do you continue on this vagrant course?

    That would be because you have no other choice, having self lobomomized yourself decades ago and can no longer think for yourself but on ...[text shortened]... pe the NEVER happens, in fact, am 99% sure it won't, if it does, CHOKE on your pathetic victory.
    The apostle Paul wrote:
    For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,

    (Romans 1:18 KJV)
    O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

    (1 Timothy 6:20-21 KJV)

    And from the apostle Peter:
    For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

    (2 Peter 3:5-7 KJV)
  10. Joined
    31 Aug '06
    Moves
    40565
    25 Nov '14 08:55
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Like I said that is not evidence. At best, it is speculation based on vivid imaginations.
    No, at worst it's just speculation from evidence. At best, it turns out to be the correct explanation.
  11. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    26 Nov '14 06:56
    Originally posted by C Hess
    No, at worst it's just speculation from evidence. At best, it turns out to be the correct explanation.
    Why God put our Testicles on the Outside.

    The Real Reason

    YouTube
  12. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    26 Nov '14 20:51
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    The apostle Paul wrote:
    For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,

    (Romans 1:18 KJV)
    O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some p ...[text shortened]... nto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

    (2 Peter 3:5-7 KJV)
    I give you MY words and you prove once again to be incapable of independent thought.
  13. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    27 Nov '14 05:36
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I give you MY words and you prove once again to be incapable of independent thought.
    Our words are not better than those of the Holy Bible. 😏
  14. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 Dec '14 01:10
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Our words are not better than those of the Holy Bible. 😏
    In other words, you CAN'T think independently, you gave that up decades ago.
  15. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    02 Dec '14 08:39
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    In other words, you CAN'T think independently, you gave that up decades ago.
    A wise person learns from the folly of others. 😏
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree