Why god designed testicles.

Originally posted by C Hess
😲

http://youtu.be/4_G9awnDCmg

This is the best thing ever to be brought to this forum...

Originally posted by JS357
If he thinks about how atoms naturally combine to form molecular structures, he'll be more likely to accept the emergence of self-replicating DNA precursors.

You'd think so, wouldn't you? I haven't had much experience with this sonship guy, so maybe you're right about him, but I've tried to explain this process to RJHinds and KellyJay in the past. They always fall back to thinking of evolution as a purely random process. They repeatedly fail to grasp the selection part of the equation. 😞

Originally posted by sonship
Don't remember the details but the bottom line was that there was a good reason for the human eye BEING the way it is.

The reason it is the way it is, is because it evolved that way. Any other explanation you come up with, will immediately fail the test of observing what types of eyes various animals have.

Originally posted by sonship
Don't remember the details but the bottom line was that there was a good reason for the human eye BEING the way it is.

I don't remember why but someone told me that "I don't remember why"
was not a valid proof.

Originally posted by hakima
This is the best thing ever to be brought to this forum...

🙂

Originally posted by twhitehead
The reason it is the way it is, is because it evolved that way. Any other explanation you come up with, will immediately fail the test of observing what types of eyes various animals have.

It was made that way is the simplest explanation and the simplest explanation is the best and most likely the correct explanation according to Occam's razor. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
It was made that way is the simplest explanation and the simplest explanation is the best and most likely the correct explanation according to Occam's razor. 😏

I was going to ask who made god, but realised that me doing so, would be the equivalent of you bringing up the topic of abiogenesis. 😕

Incidently, one has only to look at the backwards wiring of the eye, the distance between the eye and the visual cortex, and the blind spot error correction going on in the brain, to tell that the eye came about through a series of incremental fixes, rather than through a purposeful, intelligent design. Evolutionary theory fits the evidence better, so it defeats the "simple" magic you propose.

Originally posted by C Hess
I was going to ask who made god, but realised that me doing so, would be the equivalent of you bringing up the topic of abiogenesis. 😕

Incidently, one has only to look at the backwards wiring of the eye, the distance between the eye and the visual cortex, and the blind spot error correction going on in the brain, to tell that the eye came about through a ...[text shortened]... ign. Evolutionary theory fits the evidence better, so it defeats the "simple" magic you propose.

It is much too complicated to have randomly evolved. The simplest explanation is that it was designed by a super intelligent designer, i.e. God.

Originally posted by RJHinds
It is much too complicated to have randomly evolved.

I agree. Without natural selection - a decidedly non-random process - the idea of evolutionary theory is absolutely bonkers.

Originally posted by C Hess
I agree. Without natural selection - a decidedly non-random process - the idea of evolutionary theory is absolutely bonkers.

Now it appears you are making some sense for a change.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Now it appears you are making some sense for a change.

You better check your meds again.

Originally posted by sonhouse
You better check your meds again.

Surely you must agree with Hess that the idea of evolutionary theory is absolutely bonkers. Right? Oh yeah, that is without natural selection, more magical words. Abracadabra.

YouTube

Originally posted by RJHinds
Surely you must agree with Hess that the idea of evolutionary theory is absolutely bonkers. Right? Oh yeah, that is without natural selection, more magical words. Abracadabra.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH850qp85Zk

LOL! Steve Miller Band. The memories!

Natural selection, as you well know by now, is the very opposite of magical incantations.

Originally posted by C Hess
LOL! Steve Miller Band. The memories!

Natural selection, as you well know by now, is the very opposite of magical incantations.

However, if natural selection is not a random process or magic then it must have at least an algorithim to use in the selecting process.

Originally posted by RJHinds
However, if natural selection is not a random process or magic then it must have at least an algorithim to use in the selecting process.

http://www.counterbalance.org/evotheo/evolu2-frame.html