@chaney3 saidYou should defend whatever interpretation you want. And it's your prerogative, of course, to not actually address the interpretation you disagree with [in this case Rajk999's] and to instead do nothing much more than call it "poor" and "spreading lies" and "pure dishonesty" and "blind" etc. etc.
Stop defending a poor interpretation.
@chaney3 saidThe idea that faith without works is "dead" means that works are obligatory for "salvation" and what faith is or how it is demonstrated is up to Jesus on 'judgement day', or so the supposedly "poor interpretation' goes.
The debate is confused between how good works affects salvation.
@chaney3 saidWhat about compliance with Jesus' commandments and being faithful to his teaching about how to live one's life and believing in that message either directly or indirectly? Is that not a form of "faith"?
#1...Christians do good works to please Jesus.
#2... Christians do good works to get into Heaven.
#3... Belief in Jesus is required.
Rajk fails #3.