Go back
World Cup prayers

World Cup prayers

Spirituality


-Removed-
If all you're going to do when I answer your questions is re-iterate your lies about what you think I said, then next time you feel like asking me a question, why don't you do us both a favor and go pound sand, instead?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Just my 2 cents.

A sports team winning a game, especially a championship, is no little thing. Millions are affected and enormous sums of money changes hands. Something that impactful would likely not fly under God's radar. My opinion.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @chaney3
I think what she's saying is that if a man is righteous, he would pray for more important things and not be bothered praying about a sports event.

Maybe you're confused with the way she phrased it.
Yes, the man who would pray for his team is not necessarily wicked, sinful or evil, as he would like to project me as saying. But IF he were righteous, he simply wouldn't do it.

In order to be CALLED 'righteous', one must actually BE righteous. But, not being righteous does not mean one is UNrighteous. Every day on this website I marvel at all the Brits here who have an astonishingly loose grasp of their own language.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @tom-wolsey
Just my 2 cents.

A sports team winning a game, especially a championship, is no little thing. Millions are affected and enormous sums of money changes hands. Something that impactful would likely not fly under God's radar. My opinion.
"For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows." -- 1 Timothy 6:10, KJV


Originally posted by @suzianne
Yes, the man who would pray for his team is not necessarily wicked, sinful or evil, as he would like to project me as saying. But IF he were righteous, he simply wouldn't do it.

In order to be CALLED 'righteous', one must actually BE righteous. But, not being righteous does not mean one is UNrighteous. Every day on this website I marvel at all the Brits here who have an astonishingly loose grasp of their own language.
No offense but what you just said by reasonable deduction is, if someone prays for their team to win, they are not righteous, i.e. unrighteous.

I would rather hear someone say something like, "Praying for your team to win is not exactly the most righteous thing you could do."

Boil this down. If praying for a team is unrighteous or as someone else implied, too petty and we should pray for greater things, for others' lives to improve in some way. Then praying for a raise or a promotion also qualifies. Praying for anything selfish.. like praying for the tornado not to tear YOUR house down.. or for God to improve YOUR personal health... would be unrighteous and petty. If you take it all the way down the slippery slope, we're all unrighteous unless we pray for grandiose things like world peace and the end to world hunger.


Originally posted by @suzianne
"For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows." -- 1 Timothy 6:10, KJV
Millions or billions of dollars changing hands has an enormous ripple effect across communities, cities, countries. Not important enough for God to be involved?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @suzianne
Yes, the man who would pray for his team is not necessarily wicked, sinful or evil, as he would like to project me as saying. But IF he were righteous, he simply wouldn't do it.

In order to be CALLED 'righteous', one must actually BE righteous. But, not being righteous does not mean one is UNrighteous. Every day on this website I marvel at all the Brits here who have an astonishingly loose grasp of their own language.
I don't like those snobby Brits either. 🙂


Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @chaney3
My condolences wolfgang59.
Thank you.
It was 7 years ago, but thank-you.

1 edit



Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Apparently you missed this part.

Originally posted by @suzianne
In order to be CALLED 'righteous', one must actually BE righteous. But, not being righteous does not mean one is UNrighteous.


Originally posted by @suzianne
Apparently you missed this part.

Originally posted by @suzianne
[b]In order to be CALLED 'righteous', one must actually BE righteous. But, not being righteous does not mean one is UNrighteous.
[/b]
You better brush up on your Set Theory.

1 edit