Originally posted by Dasa
Vedic religion is the only religion that supports Sanatana Dharma and the only religion that demands the sanctity of life be upheld by way of non slaughter of animals.
Oh by the way....... its the only religion on earth that is taught in the perfect spiritual language Sanskrit.
Sanskrit is the only language on earth that can express true religion/spirituality.
I have more.
The thing is Dasa, you can say all of this, but then someone like me (and many others) comes along and says "I don't believe you". And It's not just you I don't believe, I don't believe what Christians say about their god, I don't believe what muslims say about their god, I don't believe what Scientologists, say about their god, and so on ...
I won't believe anything that requires me to adopt magical thinking unless I actually experience that magic first hand and can verify I am not insane.
To this end let's look at what you claim:
Vedic religion is the only religion that supports Sanatana Dharma and the only religion that demands the sanctity of life be upheld by way of non slaughter of animals.
Ok ... but that isn't evidence your religion is true, only evidence it supports non-slaughter of animals and Sanatana Dharma.
Oh by the way....... its the only religion on earth that is taught in the perfect spiritual language Sanskrit.
I don't believe your claim that there is a perfect spiritual language, and I don't believe your claim that supposing there is a perfect language, it is the one in which your religion is taught.
Sanskrit is the only language on earth that can express true religion/spirituality.
I don't believe you.
That is why you don't do very well on these forums ... you simply don't get the concept that we simply don't believe you. Just like you don't believe muslims who profess that their religion is true. What's more you haven't shown us that what you are preaching is even feasible. Some of the better theists on these boards *have* done that - namely they have successfully shown that certain things that they claim (which some of us might have argued are untenable), could well hold true *if* their god happened to exists. You have never done this.