1 edit
Originally posted by DasaOriginally posted by Dasa
I would discuss the Vedas if you posed a sincere question.
In fact I have had about 3 sincere question in this forum over the last 24 months.
"I would discuss the Vedas if you posed a sincere question..." Your definition of and criteria for "sincere" [which is between ship and syphilis in the dictionary]? Being sincere [sincerely right or wrong] is a far cry from focused and objective.
Originally posted by Dasa"Vedic religion is the only religion that supports Sanatana Dharma and the only religion that demands the sanctity of life be upheld by way of non slaughter of animals."
Vedic religion is the only religion that supports Sanatana Dharma and the only religion that demands the sanctity of life be upheld by way of non slaughter of animals.
Oh by the way....... its the only religion on earth that is taught in the perfect spiritual language Sanskrit.
Sanskrit is the only language on earth that can express true religion/spirituality.
I have more.
Buddha spoke of the Sanatana Dharma. He refered to it by other names as well. My knowledge and understanding of the Vedic religion is virtually nil, but that it uses the idea that the non-slaughtering of animals supports the sanctity of life is to my way of thinking bass ackward.
I would ask, how does elevating the health and well being of animals above human life support the sanctity of life? Isn't human life more valuable than an animal's life? Would you not kill an animal to save a human being in the event that it was necessary?
"Oh by the way....... its the only religion on earth that is taught in the perfect spiritual language Sanskrit."
I've heard you say that before. It leaves me wondering how anyone can learn this perfect religion if it is only taught in Sanskrit. That leaves most of the world left bereft of hope don't you think?
"Sanskrit is the only language on earth that can express true religion/spirituality."
How many people understand Sanskrit? Seems hopeless for the majority that they well ever learn this perfect religion. It seems to me that a perfect religion would be accessible to all don't you think? It follows logically that if Sanskrit is the only language one can learn the perfect religion/spirituality by, and only a few can understand it, then it doesn't seem so perfect to me. Why would God make spiritual enlightenment accessible to so few?
"I have more."
So do I.
Originally posted by josephwIt is not often I agree with Joseph in this forum, but I gave him a thumb-up for that.
It follows logically that if Sanskrit is the only language one can learn the perfect religion/spirituality by, and only a few can understand it, then it doesn't seem so perfect to me. Why would God make spiritual enlightenment accessible to so few?