Originally posted by @romans1009I don't think it's an example of Christian 'good works'. I think it is just common humanity and common decency. And I think 1 Timothy 5:8 gives you short shrift on that matter. I do wonder if your aim here is to satirize 'once saved always saved' Christians and bring them into ill-repute.
I didn’t say “looking after.” I said being her sole caregiver. I’m glad now I didn’t go into all that that involves. Had I known you were such a low class person, I wouldn’t have divulged any personal info on here.
Originally posted by @fmfYou didn’t tell me right at the outset. And the question is not if you’re a woman, it’s if you pretended to be a woman on one of your fake accounts.
Of course, I did. Not a woman. Not a paedophile. And my posting style is not the result of being raped as a child. These are all false rumours. And I told you so right at the outset.
Originally posted by @romans1009The "masquerading as a woman" rumour that you have been hammering away at for weeks was part of the "paedophile" rumour. It was all one thing. Did the person who told you the "masquerading as a woman" rumour not tell you the "paedophile" bit as well?
False. And there you go again, bringing up the other two rumors I have never and would never mention.
Originally posted by @fmfDodge noted again.
The "masquerading as a woman" rumour that you have been hammering away at for weeks was part of the "paedophile" rumour. It was all one thing. Did the person who told you the "masquerading as a woman" rumour not tell you the "paedophile" bit as well?
Did you ever use the screen name Dutchess64? Yes or No?
Originally posted by @romans1009I told you it was a false rumour straight away. And I told you that it was part of a set of rumours that all came from the same disgruntled poster, all at the same time. Who told you about the "masquerading as a woman" rumour?
You didn’t tell me right at the outset. And the question is not if you’re a woman, it’s if you pretended to be a woman on one of your fake accounts.
Originally posted by @fmfIt’s very interesting. On one hand, you seem offended by what you say is a false rumor (that you pretended to be a woman on one of your fake accounts.)
Why are you asking me?
And what about my unanswered questions about evidence of "God's Holy Spirit" working in you?
Or is perhaps that the answer to my question?
On the other hand, you dodge answering the question of whether you pretended to be a woman - keeping the rumor alive - and you then bring up two more rumors nobody has mentioned and nobody is interested in and you continuously publicize them.
🙄
Originally posted by @fmfDodge noted again.
I told you it was a false rumour straight away. And I told you that it was part of a set of rumours that all came from the same disgruntled poster, all at the same time. Who told you about the "masquerading as a woman" rumour?
Did you ever use the screen name Dutchess64? Yes or No?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWho has suggested that I am and why?
Dodge noted again.
Did you ever use the screen name Dutchess64? Yes or No?
Originally posted by @fmfDid you create the screen name Duchess64? Yes or No.
I don't think it's an example of Christian 'good works'. I think it is just common humanity and common decency. And I think 1 Timothy 5:8 gives you short shrift on that matter. I do wonder if your aim here is to satirize 'once saved always saved' Christians and bring them into ill-repute.
If yes, did you wear frilly panties when you posted as Duchess64?
Originally posted by @fmfYou were the one who brought up your fake accounts and your apology to the community a few weeks ago. How do you think I heard about them?
The "masquerading as a woman" rumour that you have been hammering away at for weeks was part of the "paedophile" rumour. It was all one thing. Did the person who told you the "masquerading as a woman" rumour not tell you the "paedophile" bit as well?
Originally posted by @romans1009Who did you get this rumour from?
If yes, did you wear frilly panties when you posted as Duchess64?