Originally posted by @fmfHow could I think you’re a man impersonating a woman when I’ve only been on the site for five weeks and all your naughty behavior that references took place years ago?
There are things about the character and behaviour of both screen names that give cause for suspicion. Whether they are right or wrong, it will probably be revealed in the fullness of time. That suspicion is based on interacting with you. It's an accusation, not a rumour. If Romans1009 suspects that I am a man impersonating a woman based on interacting with me, he should say so - he should just make the accusation.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerNo, it was because of a disagreement about a Bible verse. He made an error and was mortified that it was me - of all people - who pointed it out.
So the person that interacted with you at the time and accused you of being a woman should have said so based on his interaction with you?
He retaliated by claiming that I had been "masquerading as a woman" in order to "dupe minors" into trusting me and that the children on this website might not be safe.
Despite this 'banter-rumour', he had ~ regardless ~ been wrong about Bible verse, and it was indeed me who pointed it out.
He later was forced by the website to apologize for claiming that I had been impersonating a woman [it was Romans1009 who changed this to "women" -
plural - and added all the stuff about "panties and high heels"] and he was forced to apologize for claiming that I may have been a paedophile preying on minors.
Originally posted by @romans1009It would appear that keeping the rumour alive for weeks and weeks was something you thought was funny and it always cropped up when you were bailing out of the ongoing conversation.
How could I think you’re a man impersonating a woman when I’ve only been on the site for five weeks and all your naughty behavior that references took place years ago?
FMF: It's all here Thread 174151.The answer to "No wonder you had to apologize to the community and website’s owners for your behavior. Or are you going to deny that?" is found there.
Originally posted by @romans1009
Not interested enough to read through five pages of nonsense.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmfWell he is not here to defend himself is he so you can just throw him under the bus.
No, it was because of a disagreement about a Bible verse. He made an error and was mortified that it was me - of all people - who pointed it out.
He retaliated by claiming that I had been "masquerading as a woman" in order to "dupe minors" into trusting me and that the children on this website might not be safe.
Despite this 'banter-rumour', he had ~ re ...[text shortened]... and he was forced to apologize for claiming that I may have been a paedophile preying on minors.
1 edit
Originally posted by @dj2beckerrobbie carrobie threw himself under a bus several times a month - for years - without any assistance. The website kicked him off altogether in the end.
Well he is not here to defend himself is he so you can just throw him under the bus.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWell, whether you believe it was robbie carrobie who started the rumours or not, there's no denying that Romans1009 has been doing his best to keep the 'masquerading as a woman' part going, even if he did decide to leave the 'paedophile' part of the same rumour out.
We were talking about the supposed person that supposedly called FMF a peadophile because they disagreed about a supposed Bible verse. Try to keep up.
Originally posted by @fmfWhat are you talking about? Are you referencing another poster?
No, it was because of a disagreement about a Bible verse. He made an error and was mortified that it was me - of all people - who pointed it out.
He retaliated by claiming that I had been "masquerading as a woman" in order to "dupe minors" into trusting me and that the children on this website might not be safe.
Despite this 'banter-rumour', he had ~ re ...[text shortened]... and he was forced to apologize for claiming that I may have been a paedophile preying on minors.