Originally posted by @fmfNo it “cropped up” when you decided to troll me by bringing up my elderly mother and how my being her sole caregiver didn’t qualify as good works.
It would appear that keeping the rumour alive for weeks and weeks was something you thought was funny and it always cropped up when you were bailing out of the ongoing conversation.
You seem to love to dish it out. Your problem is you can’t take it.
Originally posted by @fmfI only knew you created fake accounts because you brought it up a few weeks ago. When (apparently) somebody else said on one of those accounts you pretended to be a woman, I asked you if that was true.
It would appear that keeping the rumour alive for weeks and weeks was something you thought was funny and it always cropped up when you were bailing out of the ongoing conversation.
You could have ended it right then and there by saying “No.” But you instead dodged the question - for weeks - and brought up two other rumors I didn’t know about and hadn’t mentioned.
Why are you such a drama queen?
Originally posted by @fmfIt must be on the first page because that’s as far as I got though I did skim pages 3 and 4 to see if it got more interesting. It didn’t.
The answer to "No wonder you had to apologize to the community and website’s owners for your behavior. Or are you going to deny that?" is found there.
Originally posted by @romans1009You've known that it was a false rumour - and part and parcel of an accusation that I was a paedophile - for weeks. And yet you continued with it. You even apologized for it. And then continued with it again. Puerile and repetitious banter. That's what it has been.
I only knew you created fake accounts because you brought it up a few weeks ago. When (apparently) somebody else said on one of those accounts you pretended to be a woman, I asked you if that was true.
Originally posted by @fmfYou were the one who brought up your fake accounts and (apparently) another poster said on one of those accounts, you pretended to be a woman. I just asked you if it was true.
No, it was robbie carrobie but Romans1009 decided to pick up half of the false rumour and run with that here for a few weeks.
Originally posted by @romans1009You've known it was a false rumour for weeks.
You could have ended it right then and there by saying “No.” But you instead dodged the question - for weeks - and brought up two other rumors I didn’t know about and hadn’t mentioned.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmfAnd that was your fault because you could have categorically said it wasn't true. In fact you still haven't given an unambiguous answer.
You've known that it was a false rumour - and part and parcel of an accusation that I was a paedophile - for weeks. And yet you continued with it. You even apologized for it. And then continued with it again. Puerile and repetitious banter. That's what it has been.
Originally posted by @romans1009Why are you asking me? What happened since 31st January this year that has caused you to ask me this?
Will you answer this: Did you ever use the screen name Dutchess64?
Originally posted by @fmfI asked the question. You refused to answer it. The only time I brought it up after that was when you decided to troll me by bringing up my mother.
Well, whether you believe it was robbie carrobie who started the rumours or not, there's no denying that Romans1009 has been doing his best to keep the 'masquerading as a woman' part going, even if he did decide to leave the 'paedophile' part of the same rumour out.