Young Earth Creationism and Time
04 Apr '13 20:22Originally posted by AThousandYoungThis is an interesting comment out of the mainstream.
Adam was a village not a person
Care to elaborate?
05 Apr '13 00:17Originally posted by sonhouseMaybe your problem is relying too much on your own feeble brain. I could help you out if you would let me. You don't have to be afraid of me, I am not planning on hurting you.
I think I figured out why creationists are afraid to use their own brain but rely instead on other people:
They have an extreme deep seated inferiority complex, as a group, because of the extreme brainwashing inherent in religions, especially Christianity, as to make them feel human intelligence cannot be trusted, failing miserably in comparison to their ...[text shortened]... HEMSELVES to say anything about the past for fear of being compared to their alleged god.
05 Apr '13 00:411 editOriginally posted by sonhouseYep.... it's like ego has to always be right , and by alligning their views with that of other Christians their ego's think this is the best way of covering as most bases as possible so they can be right.
I think I figured out why creationists are afraid to use their own brain but rely instead on other people:
They have an extreme deep seated inferiority complex, as a group, because of the extreme brainwashing inherent in religions, especially Christianity, as to make them feel human intelligence cannot be trusted, failing miserably in comparison to their HEMSELVES to say anything about the past for fear of being compared to their alleged god.
05 Apr '13 00:46Originally posted by AThousandYoungYep. That's the only way it can possibly make any sense.
Adam was a village not a person
05 Apr '13 00:54Originally posted by RJHindsYou are awesome. God thinks so. So is Sonhouse, he's awesome too, so is his brain.
Maybe your problem is relying too much on your own feeble brain. I could help you out if you would let me. You don't have to be afraid of me, I am not planning on hurting you.
05 Apr '13 02:21Originally posted by Suzianne
This is an interesting comment out of the mainstream.
Care to elaborate?
http://www.ldolphin.org/eden/
One clue lies in linguistics: the term Eden, or Edin, appears first in Sumer, the Mesopotamian region that produced the world's first written language. This was in the third millennium B.C., more than three thousand years after the rise of the Ubaid culture. In Sumerian the word "Eden" meant simply "fertile plain." The word "Adam" also existed in cuneiform, meaning something like "settlement on the plain."
05 Apr '13 02:24Originally posted by karoly aczelAll those cultures already existed. The heirs of Adam are all the civilizations that grew out of the Middle East. Chinese and Peruvian civilization did not come from Adam and Adam is the cultural ancestor not biological ancestor.
Yep. That's the only way it can possibly make any sense.
I mean where do Chinese people come from? from Adam(the human male)?
What about Africans? Adam?
What about those Pacific islanders?
Eskimos?
Australian aborigines?
05 Apr '13 02:47Originally posted by karoly aczelBut wrong. 😏
You are awesome. God thinks so. So is Sonhouse, he's awesome too, so is his brain.
God thinks that we are all awesome or potentially awesome. God wants us to use the brains He gave us. He wants us to be happy by discovering and then understanding the universe that He put us into.
Your constant misunderstanding of posters and their psychological ...[text shortened]... one of the highlights for me as he is consistently thoughtful, logical and easy to follow.
05 Apr '13 12:28Originally posted by karoly aczel*Basking in the glow* 🙂 BTW RJ here is another notch off your creationist stance. We are getting closer to understanding the origin of life on Earth:
You are awesome. God thinks so. So is Sonhouse, he's awesome too, so is his brain.
God thinks that we are all awesome or potentially awesome. God wants us to use the brains He gave us. He wants us to be happy by discovering and then understanding the universe that He put us into.
Your constant misunderstanding of posters and their psychological ...[text shortened]... one of the highlights for me as he is consistently thoughtful, logical and easy to follow.
05 Apr '13 20:25Originally posted by sonhouseIt states, "The mystery of how living organisms sprung out of lifeless rock has long puzzled scientists." That is because living organisms have not sprung out of lifeless rock. They must not have ever heard of the law of biogenesis, attributed to Louis Pasteur, which is the observation that living things come only from other living things, by reproduction (e.g. a spider lays eggs, which develop into spiders). That is, life does not arise from non-living material, which was the position held by spontaneous generation.
*Basking in the glow* 🙂 BTW RJ here is another notch off your creationist stance. We are getting closer to understanding the origin of life on Earth:
http://phys.org/news/2013-04-power-primordial-soup.html
05 Apr '13 20:31Originally posted by sonhouseI tried to put that post into RJ terms. I tried ...
*Basking in the glow* 🙂 BTW RJ here is another notch off your creationist stance. We are getting closer to understanding the origin of life on Earth:
http://phys.org/news/2013-04-power-primordial-soup.html
05 Apr '13 21:09Originally posted by karoly aczelI am saying that regardless of whatever you think is so wonderful about Sunhouse that he is also WRONG about God, the age of the Earth, and the theory of Evil-lution. 😏
C'mon , I made an effort and you are so lazy as to not even tell me as to how or what I'm wrong about.
How can we talk like this?
05 Apr '13 21:53Originally posted by RJHindsI understand this.
I am saying that regardless of whatever you think is so wonderful about Sunhouse that he is also WRONG about God, the age of the Earth, and the theory of Evil-lution. 😏
Back to Top