Originally posted by weststigersbob
ICC Test Rankings:
Put simply, they are a farce. I don't put any stock in them at all. At the moment, there is no genuine #1 side, and every side struggles away from conditions that don't suit them.
England:
They took spoons to a knife fight. They didn't have the tools to win on spinning tracks. Australia will have the same problem. India just ne ...[text shortened]... ting injured bowling so stopped. Australia's last genuine all rounder was probably Keith Miller.
excellent points
#1 It isn't me you have to convince, but your fellow Aussie, who is a keen ranker!
#2 absolutely. Since Swann retired, we don't have a class spinner, like any other side, apart from the Asian countries. V difficult to compete on the Indian wickets with that handicap. It is always a different story when India tour over here when, of course, they meet seaming wickets, which they aren't equpped for
#3 Mitch seemed to be ask to do BOTH the #6 and first changer over here 2 years ago. He was just a v good 1 day player then, too much for him. I think his brother has put together some decent scores recently, but , as you say, gets injured a lot. You've got the Brit Renshaw opening now, anyways! (ANYONE must be better than Joe Burns!)
Interesting point about lack of Aussie all rounders ~ I guess Gilchrist was the last genuine one, though he offered a different '2nd skill'! (God, he was a worry when he came in ~ as an England fan!). Maybe Benaud/Davdison, but with batting averages I would think around 25, more bowlers who could bat a bit
Get back to you after Xmas on the Boxing Day test, have a good Christmas