Originally posted by whodey
You can interpret the data how you wish.
I took the liberty of running some more numbers. I looked at both winners and losers in the World Series to see where they fall in terms of payroll.
It looks as if those who were 15 or above in terms of payroll there were 18 appearances. For those below the magical 15 number there were only 4 appearences.
So ...[text shortened]... ho appear in the World Series are in the top 15 teams in payroll, at least over the last decade.
I have the sense to know that the numbers you crunched don't mean squat.
You can spend a ton of money of players who get hurt or under-perform and they won't win.
You can spend frugally on hungry talent and with some decent coaching, they can prevail.
It doesn't always happen, but it happens more often than you give credit for.
It is you who are placing a dumb interpretation of your "statistics"
FYI...the most talent laden team in the world can lose in a short series.
THAT is a fact!!! It happens frequently too!!
Now you say if a team spends in the top 15 salaries, they make the playoffs
and have a great chance to win the world series?
Try to sell that one in Tampa or Pittsburgh, or Miami.
Explain to me why the Altanta Braves, for years with one of the highest payrolls,
won a total of one world series?
Explain to me why the NYY don't win every year?
The goal isn't to make the playoffs, it is to win the world series.