Tevez has movement, trickery and helps his midfield more, however Torres has pace and a deadly eye for goal, as seen in his goal talley.
However, if you combine Tevez and Rooneys goal talleys overide Torres and kuyts talleys.
So, who is better?
However, i think that Tevez is better, cause of his ability to make something out of nothing like he proved with West ham, and i believe torres would not have been able to do that cause he needs a team to support him.
What do u think?
Originally posted by Pawafool Tevez has movement, trickery and helps his midfield more, however Torres has pace and a deadly eye for goal, as seen in his goal talley.
However, if you combine Tevez and Rooneys goal talleys overide Torres and kuyts talleys.
So, who is better?
However, i think that Tevez is better, cause of his ability to make something out of nothing like he proved wit ...[text shortened]... res would not have been able to do that cause he needs a team to support him.
What do u think?
Hard to say. The fact that Torres is doing it at Liverpool is more telling than Tevez doing it at West Ham, IMHO.
Torres would be perfect at United, as he can lead an attack, has skill, pace and is tall. He'd be perfect in our preferred European formation of 4-5-1.
I'm not sure we should sign Tevez on a long term deal. While a class act, I'm not sure he's what United need (lack of height and true pace), especially given the money that's being spoken about.
I'd much prefer to spend that type of money on a player like Benzema.
At the moment I will agree that Torres is the better player, however both players are young enough to improve massively. I think Tevez will improve more than Torres simply because he will be playing a higher level of football more regularly. Torres' talent will decline so rapidly that he will soon be able to follow that great Liverpool tradition of waiting in his council house for his Giro to arrive every fortnight.[/Bait]
Tevez or Torres?
22 Mar '08 19:13
Back to Top