10 Feb '08 15:10>1 edit
regarding the November 2007 Mini Banded Quartet ! 1250-1300.
D1013 says "With your rating, why are you in this tournament? You're going to win. But is it worth it? MissOleum has already resigned in protest."
I refer you to your own Clan (QPR). Your point leader Mulgabill has recently WON the 1300-1350 Octet V Tournament with a current rating of 1602 (I let you look into the history of this if you dare). So you, in fact, are on the same team with someone whose chess ethics you don't agree with. HMMM, do I sense some hypocrisy or is it ignorance? Perhaps a bit of both? If I were you the first thing I would be worrying aout is finding another team. So that when you take the "moral high ground" you don't have skeletons in your own home that people can use to easily pick your argument apart. So to recap, I don't feel a need to answer to the likes of a person who is not congruent with their argument and life decisions.
But I will open this up to public forum since I can certainly see that there may be a valid point to your argument (even though you are not in my opinion worthy of making such an argument for the reason mentioned above).
I have not won anything as of yet. There are other players in many other tournaments that have won their tourny with ratings that were lower at the time that they entered. I broke no rule according to RHP (as far as I know). I stand on my own chess abilities and use no books or sorcerers magic. Perhaps we should go back in the annals of tournament history and strip all the titles of players who held or hold higher ratings than there tournament allowed for entry? Is this a problem? Not for me I realize that it happens all the time. In, fact I would image the great percentage of tournaments a won by players who have higher rating than the ones they had when they entered. Knowing that I still proudly and happily participate. My rating fluctuates and although I would not admit to being a 1250-1300 rated player there are times that my game suffers and I lose to players of these rating. At the time that I entered I felt I needed to work my way back so I started with this tournament. The tournaments have their requirements. I fell within those requirements. I do not believe I am misrepresenting myself. My rating is open for all RHP players to view. You chose to enter into the tourny as did miss oleum.
D1013 says "With your rating, why are you in this tournament? You're going to win. But is it worth it? MissOleum has already resigned in protest."
I refer you to your own Clan (QPR). Your point leader Mulgabill has recently WON the 1300-1350 Octet V Tournament with a current rating of 1602 (I let you look into the history of this if you dare). So you, in fact, are on the same team with someone whose chess ethics you don't agree with. HMMM, do I sense some hypocrisy or is it ignorance? Perhaps a bit of both? If I were you the first thing I would be worrying aout is finding another team. So that when you take the "moral high ground" you don't have skeletons in your own home that people can use to easily pick your argument apart. So to recap, I don't feel a need to answer to the likes of a person who is not congruent with their argument and life decisions.
But I will open this up to public forum since I can certainly see that there may be a valid point to your argument (even though you are not in my opinion worthy of making such an argument for the reason mentioned above).
I have not won anything as of yet. There are other players in many other tournaments that have won their tourny with ratings that were lower at the time that they entered. I broke no rule according to RHP (as far as I know). I stand on my own chess abilities and use no books or sorcerers magic. Perhaps we should go back in the annals of tournament history and strip all the titles of players who held or hold higher ratings than there tournament allowed for entry? Is this a problem? Not for me I realize that it happens all the time. In, fact I would image the great percentage of tournaments a won by players who have higher rating than the ones they had when they entered. Knowing that I still proudly and happily participate. My rating fluctuates and although I would not admit to being a 1250-1300 rated player there are times that my game suffers and I lose to players of these rating. At the time that I entered I felt I needed to work my way back so I started with this tournament. The tournaments have their requirements. I fell within those requirements. I do not believe I am misrepresenting myself. My rating is open for all RHP players to view. You chose to enter into the tourny as did miss oleum.