Originally posted by seraphimvulture Now... say whoever wins one of those programs suddenly has a big rating boost in the following months.... Do we stone them?
Ve hav vays and means...
Engines are a great learning tools, and particularly useful for post-game analysis. But any tool can be misused. Do we blame the tool? Or the wielder of the tool?
Originally posted by Gatecrasher Ve hav vays and means...
Engines are a great learning tools, and particularly useful for post-game analysis. But any tool can be misused. Do we blame the tool? Or the wielder of the tool?
So you're saying the second gun-man was actually the gun itself.... Brilliant!
Originally posted by XanthosNZ That's important. Write that down.
He did just now. Your jokes are absolutely brilliant *
EDIT: corrected the form of the adjective which only occured to me after posting being orthographically challenged as a second language English-speaker
It took some risk and a lot of patience, but I'm entry number 216!! 😀
Unless someone withdraws. 😕
I have my first psychological win already, let's start this tournament.
Originally posted by seraphimvulture Now... say whoever wins one of those programs suddenly has a big rating boost in the following months.... Do we stone them?
lol, no its the great games that they study and now they truely understands the finer details of chess.
Originally posted by blackmanrook when the peace on earth challenge going to start?
Now!
Unfortunately, the server is having trouble giving me
access to the tournament page :'(
Perhaps Russ should use the same format as in the
2006 Championship; links to the 36 groups...