Excellent move. However one small point. It can happen that a player's rating 'spikes' considerably because a much higher rated player resigns games even though in clear winning positions. This distorts a rating and it does seem unfair that a player is penalised for a year through no fault of their own.
That said, it is a small price to pay for what is a good move to go to 365 days. May be some refinement to deal with the 'spiking issue' could be considered?
Originally posted by jayaitchAs the T E R is half the difference there is only half a spike if you see what I mean
Excellent move. However one small point. It can happen that a player's rating 'spikes' considerably because a much higher rated player resigns games even though in clear winning positions. This distorts a rating and it does seem unfair that a player is penalised for a year through no fault of their own.
That said, it is a small price to pay for what is ...[text shortened]... to 365 days. May be some refinement to deal with the 'spiking issue' could be considered?
Originally posted by jayaitchYes but everyone is going to experience this so you'll find there is a weakening effect on the bands...
Excellent move. However one small point. It can happen that a player's rating 'spikes' considerably because a much higher rated player resigns games even though in clear winning positions. This distorts a rating and it does seem unfair that a player is penalised for a year through no fault of their own.
That said, it is a small price to pay for what is ...[text shortened]... to 365 days. May be some refinement to deal with the 'spiking issue' could be considered?
I Need some understanding. Why in a 0 days 21 days time bank, I got 2 time out while I was actually playing with no warning when all my other games have many days left re May 2009 Banded Hardcore Grand I 1400-1450
Description ZERO day timeout. 21 day timebank. Everyone should be time-out at the same time? or what is it that i do not understand