Originally posted by FMF
Being able to change your mind, to me, is a political virtue.
Incorrect predictions come with the territory.
If policy proposal X is the right and necessary thing to do, is it wrong to adopt policy X simply because of a prediction that policy X wasn't going to be necessary?
Where does "lying through the teeth" even enter into it?
What an odd and noxi ...[text shortened]... us mixture of political naivety and bottomless cynical seething from utherpendragon, as ever.
There's certainly nothing wrong with a politician changing his mind based on the facts on the ground. If I make a promise on national security, for instance, and then after being elected, the head of the NSA explains to me that my promise is not a good idea based on info civilians don't know about, I have the responsibility to backtrack on my promise if it's necessary for the best interests of my constituency.
Also, of course, if facts change,policy may also have to change. GW Bush's greatest weakness was that he was not able to adapt his policies to changing circumstances in many cases. His promised tax cut was based on a surging economy and a budget surplus. When the economy cooled off, he should have shelved his big tax cut. etc.
Still, the biggest question here is: Did Obama know, at the time that he made those pledges, that they were unrealistic? I can't prove it. But, I believe he did. He knew perfectly well that there were enormous budget deficits and he knew he wanted healthcare reform as part of his initial agenda. Frankly, not a whole heck of a lot has changed since he made those pledges. Again, I have no problem with some tax hikes. I do think Obama was less than forthcoming on this issue though. But hey, politicians have done worse to get elected, I will certainly concede.
By the way, USAP, when did Obama enact the greatest middle class tax cut in history?