- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@no1marauder saidTons of evidence, starting from his first days as a senator.
Because there's no actual evidence he has done anything illegal?
Here, as Vice-President, he brags about holding back a billion dollars in aid to Ukraine, unless they did what he wanted...for his personal family reasons.
@jj-adams saidBeen all through this; it wasn't for "personal family reasons" but in accordance with established policy of all Western nations and multinational lending organizations. https://www.axios.com/2019/10/02/joe-hunter-biden-ukraine-corruption-trump
Tons of evidence, starting from his first days as a senator.
Here, as Vice-President, he brags about holding back a billion dollars in aid to Ukraine, unless they did what he wanted...for his personal family reasons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CY
@no1marauder saidMany defendants lose in court based on circumstantial evidence. There is plenty of that. Why are you trying to smoke us that you think he is innocent?
Because there's no actual evidence he has done anything illegal?
@averagejoe1 saidI think he's asking for evidence. You saying there's plenty isn't helping.
Many defendants lose in court based on circumstantial evidence. There is plenty of that. Why are you trying to smoke us that you think he is innocent?
1 edit
@wildgrass saidCircumstantial evidence is a bit obvious . I think all of y'all, no offense, are not keeping up with the daily news. Again all due respects, you can understand why the lib news outlets do not show the deep throat stuff of Biden. If I were them, I would not either. If they showed it, you libs would stop watching and watch their latest ads, like Magic of the Stones Part 12.
I think he's asking for evidence. You saying there's plenty isn't helping.
Do you even know who Miranda Divine is, or Tony Bobolinski? And Comer, leading he investigation ? And Jim Jordan? They are on it, and to about to put their reps on the line .
Oh well, learn later when it is all over. But it is more fun to follow the evolvement .
We should remove almost all Affirmative Action, but I think it's a stretch to say the problem is so expansive that there's systemic disadvantage to whites. Just look at how much worse poverty is for blacks on average. That's mostly due to lack of inheritance as a result of historical discrimination.
@averagejoe1 said
Circumstantial evidence is a bit obvious . I think all of y'all, no offense, are not keeping up with the daily news. Again all due respects, you can understand why the lib news outlets do not show the deep throat stuff of Biden. If I were them, I would not either. If they showed it, you libs would stop watching and watch their latest ads, like Magic of the Stones Part ...[text shortened]... line .
Oh well, learn later when it is all over. But it is more fun to follow the evolvement .
... if they showed it...
If they showed what?
@wildgrass saidTo be clear I said evidence of circumstancial. Let us not confuse Marauder's computer, that is not helping, either
I think he's asking for evidence. You saying there's plenty isn't helping.
@wildgrass saidYes, but this issue is the concept of moving it and why. Are you daft? Why do you fellers never get an issue? They should be free to move it if the want?!?!? And should not your sentence be grammatically correct ..."....if they want to? " You left off the to.
The organization or government who paid to erect the statue should be free to remove it if they want.
History books? Well, you made the analogy. Is it the same?
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidIs the circumstance you’re referring to Biden trouncing trump in the 2020 election by any chance?
Many defendants lose in court based on circumstantial evidence. There is plenty of that. Why are you trying to smoke us that you think he is innocent?