Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 27 Sep '09 08:12
    anyone?
  2. 27 Sep '09 08:13
    dare no1m to poke his long nose out of the Sports forum?
  3. 27 Sep '09 10:12
    Originally posted by zeeblebot
    anyone still believe Iran is not pursuing nuclear weapons? anyone?
    We know that Israel has nuclear mass destruction weapons.
    Let them lead the way to an non-nuclear zone in the middle east.
  4. Standard member shavixmir
    Guppy poo
    27 Sep '09 10:13
    I don't think Iran is building nuclear weapons, no.
    However, if I was them, I'd be stockpiling the little bastards like a madman.

    What with the US (and we all know how reliable their intelligence is), Britain (rimming the US like the limp porno-star of Europe that it is) and Israel (fascist bastards) hanging around like paedophiles at a Thai nightclub, just waiting to let loose the hounds of war to divide up that lovely stash of oil. I'd be building bloody nuclear weapons!

    However, rhetoric besides, there is no proof. None what-so-ever.
    And if the US provides proof, I ain't gonna believe it. I remember Colin Powell lying to me at the UN. I ain't gonna believe US intelligence.
    And when MI6 defence strategists claim a missle is capable of reaching Europe, I'll subtract 1.000 miles off their guess.
    And when Mossad claims there are uranium based missiles outside of Teheran, I'll point a finger and shout: "SHUT UP YOU HYPOCRITES."

    And should Iran ever actually nuke Israel, I'll ask the UN to file a report into the obvious failures of its weapon inspector teams. And demand the report is three-fold, of which one digital.
  5. Standard member yo its me
    watch the acid...
    27 Sep '09 10:39
    Originally posted by shavixmir
    Britain, rimming the US like the limp porno-star of Europe that it is
    Ha! Except for the ones you know, right.

    I agree with you that if a govement says a country has weapons it means little becasue of their motives. I'd never be stocking up on weapons myself though, if I were to behave like a madman. Becasue we're all human and killing eachother is truelly madness. nationality and race mean nothing to me. If a country bombed us they'd be killing us- the end to kill them back makes no sense. But I guess that's where it's a good thing that there's different views or we'd all be Nazis now, right? Or we would then, then comumnists now Greenpeace'ists Or maybe we'd all be muslim
  6. Standard member shavixmir
    Guppy poo
    27 Sep '09 10:45
    Originally posted by yo its me
    Ha! Except for the ones you know, right.

    I agree with you that if a govement says a country has weapons it means little becasue of their motives. I'd never be stocking up on weapons myself though, if I were to behave like a madman. Becasue we're all human and killing eachother is truelly madness. nationality and race mean nothing to me. If a country bom ...[text shortened]... t? Or we would then, then comumnists now Greenpeace'ists Or maybe we'd all be muslim
    If I was to threaten you with a stick and say: "I'm gonna beat up your kid."

    Wouldn't you get a stick to hit me back with?
  7. Subscriber FMF
    a.k.a. John W Booth
    27 Sep '09 10:48
    Originally posted by shavixmir
    If I was to threaten you with a stick and say: "I'm gonna beat up your kid."

    Wouldn't you get a stick to hit me back with?
    Depends. Which one of you is the U.S. and/or its allies?
  8. 27 Sep '09 10:54
    Originally posted by shavixmir
    If I was to threaten you with a stick and say: "I'm gonna beat up your kid."

    Wouldn't you get a stick to hit me back with?
    Never mind the kid , i would hit you with a stick any way !!!
  9. Standard member yo its me
    watch the acid...
    27 Sep '09 11:00 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by shavixmir
    If I was to threaten you with a stick and say: "I'm gonna beat up your kid."

    Wouldn't you get a stick to hit me back with?
    Self defence I completely agree with. I would defend my children to the death of cause infact I'd defend anyone I saw being hurt if I could without putting my children in danger. And, yes I guess one could argue that it's self defence to build up a suply of arms if your potential emeny has them. Ultumatly though, I disagree and I think it'd be retaliation, which I'm against. If someone hit my child at school the next day I wouldn't feel the need to hit them back. I'd instruct my child to keep their distance and I've told them all they must defend themselves with words first and if neccessary with force after, which they do do.

    When it comes to nucular weapons; if Japan had them when we sent two their way, and retaliated with more then where would we be now? How dose a country defend against nucular war? It dosen't. And killing the other side would be out of hate and bitterness. It's not possiable that a whole country wants to make war.

    Besides it's all pointless anyway and everyone should live in the moment and not worry about the maybes, spending energy thinking if they hate us we'll hate them back. Also what we're talking about here is a potential of a potential in nucular weapons. In contrast, we can see the stick and persumably we know of a motive. Infact if you were to do that and knowing you're not insane I would asume you're joking.
  10. 27 Sep '09 11:41
    Originally posted by zeeblebot
    anyone?
    I don't believe anything they were palavarating at the UN. But then I still have memories of Dick Cheney, and Colin Powel. I think they have been Jonesing to get into Iran for some time now. The middle east is too much of a wild card for the NWO.
  11. 27 Sep '09 12:43
    Originally posted by zeeblebot
    dare no1m to poke his long nose out of the Sports forum?
    funniest thing ive heard for ages!
  12. Subscriber kmax87
    You've got Kevin
    27 Sep '09 13:14
    So Iran is the next frontier of freedom they will manufacture as the next war we just have to have eh? Well I suppose its the most honourable way to pay for the baillout. At least no-one will be forced to think about carbon footprints and global warming for a while. As US industry ramps up to meet the demand caused by 20 years of new world chaos that will engulf the region, who will care for downsizing?

    Anyway makes a good segue/face-saving exercise from the obvious blood nose Afghanistan is giving them, to expand their forces into the adjoining neighbour and kick some ayatollah butt. BOOYA!!!
  13. 27 Sep '09 13:26 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by kmax87
    So Iran is the next frontier of freedom they will manufacture as the next war we just have to have eh? Well I suppose its the most honourable way to pay for the baillout. At least no-one will be forced to think about carbon footprints and global warming for a while. As US industry ramps up to meet the demand caused by 20 years of new world chaos that will en ...[text shortened]... them, to expand their forces into the adjoining neighbour and kick some ayatollah butt. BOOYA!!!
    As long as I don't have to give up the ole chevy suburban, I don't care man! We need to bring American democracy to that area and stomp those holocaust denyers into camel dung. I just wish I could be there to grab the boxes of money.
  14. Subscriber kmax87
    You've got Kevin
    27 Sep '09 13:40
    Originally posted by joe beyser
    I just wish I could be there to grab the boxes of money.
    you will be in a sense if you hang on to that gas guzzling beast and if the impending war ushers in lowered relative oil prices in the US. Viva la Pax Americana!
  15. 27 Sep '09 13:53
    Originally posted by zeeblebot
    dare no1m to poke his long nose out of the Sports forum?
    He knows better. Its simply too hard defending the left these days.