@athousandyoung saidwhat law requires this baker to furnish anything?
There are laws prohibiting what the baker is doing. If you don’t like it change the law. Get the civil rights legislation repealed. We all know you right wingers want to.
And dont get mad, Im just reminding you of your prior actions
@mott-the-hoople saidThey don’t answer
libs answer this…
how is this private company any different from twitter?
You know what you all have claimed about twitter and them being able to do what they want because its a private company.
explain away
@mott-the-hoople saidThe nature of communities., which provide police, sidewalks , firemen, garbage engineers, is such that these amenities are being used by the baker, so that his existence may be enjoyed by every taxpayer. Your business must cater to all of the taxpayers of the town.
what law requires this baker to furnish anything?
And dont get mad, Im just reminding you of your prior actions
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople said(I'm not a lib but...) Laws. That's the difference.
libs answer this…
how is this private company any different from twitter?
You know what you all have claimed about twitter and them being able to do what they want because its a private company.
explain away
@athousandyoung saidYou do not answer his question. Can you read and answer directly , instead of spealing rote talking points ad nauseum?!?
There are laws prohibiting what the baker is doing. If you don’t like it change the law. Get the civil rights legislation repealed. We all know you right wingers want to.
@mott-the-hoople saidI'm not mad and you can read up on his situation yourself.
what law requires this baker to furnish anything?
And dont get mad, Im just reminding you of your prior actions
1 edit
@athousandyoung saidCould be as simple as 'oops, spilled the salt'. Do you think the best way to elicit cooperation and good service is to have goobermint wave a stick at someone, literally make them a slave.
Sounds like a great opportunity analyze the cake and sue the chef. He could have just pocketed the 400 bucks but if he wants to break the law…
1 edit
@wajoma saidLMAO! "Literally make them a slave"? Do you even know what a "slave" is?
Could be as simple as 'oops, spilled the salt'. Do you think the best way to elicit cooperation and good service is to have goobermint wave a stick at someone, literally make them a slave.
I think the best way to assure that customers aren't discriminated against by those who are allowed to operate in the economic system by the society that created it is to ban such unethical and immoral conduct.
@wajoma said
Could be as simple as 'oops, spilled the salt'. Do you think the best way to elicit cooperation and good service is to have goobermint wave a stick at someone, literally make them a slave.
the best way to elicit cooperation and good service is to have goobermint wave a stick at someone
Didn't we just have a whole thread on police violence where the conservative position was that all citizens should cooperate with government orders unconditionally?
@wildgrass saidI don't care what the other thread was about and what other people posted there.the best way to elicit cooperation and good service is to have goobermint wave a stick at someone
Didn't we just have a whole thread on police violence where the conservative position was that all citizens should cooperate with government orders unconditionally?
@wildgrass saidThat's different; that requirement is limited to black people, not God fearing Christians.the best way to elicit cooperation and good service is to have goobermint wave a stick at someone
Didn't we just have a whole thread on police violence where the conservative position was that all citizens should cooperate with government orders unconditionally?
@wajoma saidRight. Even application of laws requires some acceptance of laws that individual citizens disagree with. Depending on the situation, we seem to go round and round in this forum from "just obey the government" (borders, traffic stops, taxes) to "the government is corrupt and untrustworthy".
I don't care what the other thread was about and what other people posted there.
It sounds like this particular law is one you disagree with?
@wildgrass saidI asked what law? no one can tell me
Right. Even application of laws requires some acceptance of laws that individual citizens disagree with. Depending on the situation, we seem to go round and round in this forum from "just obey the government" (borders, traffic stops, taxes) to "the government is corrupt and untrustworthy".
It sounds like this particular law is one you disagree with?
@wildgrass saidno, we didnt! just another of your word twistingsthe best way to elicit cooperation and good service is to have goobermint wave a stick at someone
Didn't we just have a whole thread on police violence where the conservative position was that all citizens should cooperate with government orders unconditionally?