@kevcvs57 saidKev. If a loser who does not work, lives off the government, incurs a hospital bill, would be logical, or fair, to have another citizen pay the bill?
People tend not to answer you inane twisted faux scenarios about universal healthcare because they are inane twisted faux scenarios which have no basis in reality and no matter how often people do destroy these fantasy based arguments you lie and pretend that they haven’t answered your inane twisted faux scenario based question.
Any questions?
@averagejoe1 saidThe hospital would not bill another citizen to pay for the indigent patient.
Kev. If a loser who does not work, lives off the government, incurs a hospital bill, would be logical, or fair, to have another citizen pay the bill?
@handyandy saidYes, by their receiving payment from the federal government, which is money i paid in as my taxes, the money for his surgery is coming from you, me, marauder, even Earl of trumps. I kniw you get this, do tell us why you waste our time with this question. In case you missed it, I am against paying money in taxes that would be used to pay for someone else’s health problems. You see, I work hard, and that loser surfboarder does not work. Do you not get the picture? That we are in effect supporting him?
The hospital would not bill another citizen to pay for the indigent patient.
@averagejoe1 saidThe federal government would not reimburse the hospital. Do you think otherwise?
Yes, by their receiving payment from the federal government, which is money i paid in as my taxes, the money for his surgery is coming from you, me, marauder, even Earl of trumps. I kniw you get this, do tell us why you waste our time with this question. In case you missed it, I am against paying money in taxes that would be used to pay for someone else’s health problem ...[text shortened]... t loser surfboarder does not work. Do you not get the picture? That we are in effect supporting him?
@handyandy saidHandy. I'm not going to truck with you on this, the federal 'single payer' program will cause everyone to be responsible for the health of everyone else. Big happy family. Horrible doctors. No more, please. Oh,,,and you lose.
The federal government would not reimburse the hospital. Do you think otherwise?
@handyandy saidBullpuppies.
The hospital would not bill another citizen to pay for the indigent patient.
Their hospital rates are designed to make up for the lost monies on the indigent.
Get WOKE, Andy. Why the hell do you think it costs so much now.
@averagejoe1 saidBut nobody would have personal health insurance unless they wanted extras like being able to book the date and time of your surgery. Everybody pays for everybody, just like roads, rockets and railways.
Kev. If a loser who does not work, lives off the government, incurs a hospital bill, would be logical, or fair, to have another citizen pay the bill?
Are you suggesting the loser with the shark bite should be left to bleed out on the beach?
@kevcvs57 saidHope he makes it, I guess, but you imply that if I were there, that I get an ambulance, take him to hospital, and pay the hospital for saving him. I only make $300/ week, so should I find a man who works harder, makes more money, and get HIM to pay it? How do we decide who pays for this loser, so he can go back into the water?
But nobody would have personal health insurance unless they wanted extras like being able to book the date and time of your surgery. Everybody pays for everybody, just like roads, rockets and railways.
Are you suggesting the loser with the shark bite should be left to bleed out on the beach?
If you were there, would you pay for the surgeon to sew this stranger up? You would not. So why should I? Kev?
I dont know what you mean by 'everybody pays for everybody', unless you are all in for Marxism. I do agree with your first sentence, that "(people have a choice) to be able to book the date and time of your surgery". In Marxism, or under the democrat plan, you would NOT have that choice anymore. No more private health insurance.
I was right. You folks really do not know what is going on.
@averagejoe1 saidNo, we're not paying your bills.
Kev. If a loser who does not work, lives off the government, incurs a hospital bill, would be logical, or fair, to have another citizen pay the bill?
@averagejoe1 saidWhen you buy something at a small business, does that money stay yours?
Yes, by their receiving payment from the federal government, which is money i paid in as my taxes, the money for his surgery is coming from you, me, marauder, even Earl of trumps. I kniw you get this, do tell us why you waste our time with this question. In case you missed it, I am against paying money in taxes that would be used to pay for someone else’s health problem ...[text shortened]... t loser surfboarder does not work. Do you not get the picture? That we are in effect supporting him?
No, it doesn't. It changes ownership. Just like when you pay your taxes, that money is no longer yours.
@earl-of-trumps saidHmmmm, corporate greed?
Bullpuppies.
Their hospital rates are designed to make up for the lost monies on the indigent.
Get WOKE, Andy. Why the hell do you think it costs so much now.