@wildgrass saidJust agreeing to STAY at the border is agreeing to something. Trump is threatening them with tariffs. IF. IF. If what, Wildgrass. What will he do if they do not live up to the border agreement? Tariffs. So, they must have conceded to something, you silly goose
Lol Mexican and Canadian leaders have acknowledged that they conceded nothing.
@AverageJoe1 saidUh, you say it's something but then what you describe is nothing. You don't need to tell a traffic cop to stay at his post. And if you do, then you certainly don't need to tell him you'll burn his house down if he doesn't.
Just agreeing to STAY at the border is agreeing to something. Trump is threatening them with tariffs. IF. IF. If what, Wildgrass. What will he do if they do not live up to the border agreement? Tariffs. So, they must have conceded to something, you silly goose
@wildgrass saidWhere I differ from you and Maruader, is that I just do not , for lack of a better word, research all this daily stuff,I can only get the News highlights and banter as best I can, with my only armaments....common sense, logic and rationale.
Uh, you say it's something but then what you describe is nothing. You don't need to tell a traffic cop to stay at his post. And if you do, then you certainly don't need to tell him you'll burn his house down if he doesn't.
If Trump says he is going to try to keep tran or whatever the hell y'all call them away from natural people(my words) at the 28 Olympics, , then I will go the wall defending his thinking. That one sentence is all I need to get into a debate. I need know nothing else. I find the one issue, and cannot get into the weeds. We should nickname SHouse 'Weeds'.
Would you rather tomes from me as Sonhouse pounds out? And he is not
debatable because he lacks common sense, logic and rationale.
Sorry sonhouse, you are just the best example
@AverageJoe1
Maybe this will help. Marauder thinks that it is logical that the government has somehow arranged for people that have college tuition debt just be relieved of paying that debt back. That is simply not logical. It is not logical anyway you cut it. Then you have sun house he thinks that 30,000 people who have been laid off should be kept on, making no mentionof why they may have been laid off. It was not personal. It was good business. But the deep seated problem with his thinking that. of why they may have been laid off…. It was not personal. It was good business. But the deep seated problem with his thinking is i that he considers that the country owes these jobs to these people. That is not logical.
@AverageJoe1 saidIs it common sense to declare 25% tariffs on an ally, with the potential to mutually deteriorate both states economies, and then to back away declaring victory because the other country agreed to continue doing the thing they were already doing?
Where I differ from you and Maruader, is that I just do not , for lack of a better word, research all this daily stuff,I can only get the News highlights and banter as best I can, with my only armaments....common sense, logic and rationale.
If Trump says he is going to try to keep tran or whatever the hell y'all call them away from natural people(my words) at the 28 Ol ...[text shortened]... because he lacks common sense, logic and rationale.
Sorry sonhouse, you are just the best example
My guess is that Trudeau and Sheinbaum were laughing at trump behind his back over these "agreements". Maybe trump didn't know any better, or he knew his voters wouldnt care enough to look.
@wildgrass saidWell, I would like to comment on that, but could you at least first give some credence, or dis-credence to my point just above? Am I right, or where am I wrong?
Is it common sense to declare 25% tariffs on an ally, with the potential to mutually deteriorate both states economies, and then to back away declaring victory because the other country agreed to continue doing the thing they were already doing?
My guess is that Trudeau and Sheinbaum were laughing at trump behind his back over these "agreements". Maybe trump didn't know any better, or he knew his voters wouldnt care enough to look.
@AverageJoe1 saidHello? Can I get a response on this?!??
I could watch the news stories about both of these stories all day long, but could set them aside with a common argument of logic. There’s no news story that can say it is normal to give money to the college students in some form, and nothing to anyone else that is more needy. That is not logical
@AverageJoe1 saidI don't know what you're talking about. Did you change the subject again?
Well, I would like to comment on that, but could you at least first give some credence, or dis-credence to my point just above? Am I right, or where am I wrong?
@AverageJoe1 saidI wrote this. Then, it was ingnored. What do you think....should I lay off to avoid upsetting the crazied libs?
@AverageJoe1
Maybe this will help. Marauder thinks that it is logical that the government has somehow arranged for people that have college tuition debt just be relieved of paying that debt back. That is simply not logical. It is not logical anyway you cut it. Then you have sun house he thinks that 30,000 people who have been laid off should be kept on, making no mention ...[text shortened]... nking is i that he considers that the country owes these jobs to these people. That is not logical.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou switch topics because this one is a loser for your fuhrer.
I wrote this. Then, it was ingnored. What do you think....should I lay off to avoid upsetting the crazied libs?
Trump signed trade deals, reneged on the trade deals, threatened economy-crippling new taxes on Americans, stock market tanked, then reneged on those threats, and got nothing out of the deal.
Great job?
@AverageJoe1 saidWildgrass, did you not 'skip' my post which I repost here? You little skipper, you. It hit home did it? You skipped it. I try to not skip, except for the occassinal SHouse. Can you believe how he slips prfanity by the big guys?
@AverageJoe1
Maybe this will help. Marauder thinks that it is logical that the government has somehow arranged for people that have college tuition debt just be relieved of paying that debt back. That is simply not logical. It is not logical anyway you cut it. Then you have sun house he thinks that 30,000 people who have been laid off should be kept on, making no mention ...[text shortened]... nking is i that he considers that the country owes these jobs to these people. That is not logical.
@AverageJoe1 saidThis thread is about how Trudeau played trump like a fiddle, and then trump played his MAGA loyalists. This thread is not about who pays for college.
Wildgrass, did you not 'skip' my post which I repost here? You little skipper, you. It hit home did it? You skipped it. I try to not skip, except for the occassinal SHouse. Can you believe how he slips prfanity by the big guys?
Let's pretend trump didn't threaten Canada with tariffs. Canadians would still be beefing up border security but America could also still sell liquor on Canadian shelves. It was a loser deal for trump, just like all his other deals.
@wildgrass saidI think he (Trump) may be cutting off his nose to find his nose spited his face.🤔😉
This thread is about how Trudeau played trump like a fiddle, and then trump played his MAGA loyalists. This thread is not about who pays for college.
Let's pretend trump didn't threaten Canada with tariffs. Canadians would still be beefing up border security but America could also still sell liquor on Canadian shelves. It was a loser deal for trump, just like all his other deals.
@wildgrass saidHYou lost me, ,,,,,didnt Trudeua set up a rexignatin when Trump came on board.? Tht is all I know, so I pass on commeting.
This thread is about how Trudeau played trump like a fiddle, and then trump played his MAGA loyalists. This thread is not about who pays for college.
Let's pretend trump didn't threaten Canada with tariffs. Canadians would still be beefing up border security but America could also still sell liquor on Canadian shelves. It was a loser deal for trump, just like all his other deals.
Hey, I am thinking about doing a forum vote, will Trump will be shown with the singer, Swift, at the Super Bowl? I vote no. right off the bat.