Go back
Charlie Kirk in his own words

Charlie Kirk in his own words

Debates


@no1marauder said
I don't care what it says at the end. I focused on the period from about 1:30 to 3:30 when the actual encounter between Singh and the cop is. I don't need someone else to tell me what I can see and hear myself.

The New Mexico police handled the situation correctly; there was no need for an English Proficiency Test. Politicians, media and others who say differently eith ...[text shortened]... like he knew what was going on and engaged in conversation with the cop which both got the gist of.
I wouldn’t expect you to feel any differently, would you have any issues driving around him with these great English skills and understanding of our roads? Do you think him and the other 300plus thousand illegal cdl license holders should be able to get one and keep them. It was like a month earlier in Texas another truck driver from India was in a deadly wreck, their not uncommon, we drive the roads with our families.


@mike69 said
I wouldn’t expect you to feel any differently, would you have any issues driving around him with these great English skills and understanding of our roads? Do you think him and the other 300plus thousand illegal cdl license holders should be able to get one and keep them. It was like a month earlier in Texas another truck driver from India was in a deadly wreck, their not uncommon, we drive the roads with our families.
Apparently we don't have enough according to freight executives. https://www.newsweek.com/america-trucking-shortage-logistics-supply-chain-2097123

But I'm sure this mania to get rid of workers in the US will turn out just great.


@no1marauder said
Apparently we don't have enough according to freight executives. https://www.newsweek.com/america-trucking-shortage-logistics-supply-chain-2097123

But I'm sure this mania to get rid of workers in the US will turn out just great.
What kind of sentence should this person get in your opinion. Going off your words not mine on how long he’s been a PROFESSIONAL driver we both know he didn’t mistake anything and knew he shouldn’t turn around there. Like I said a U with a line through it is also pretty basic.


@Mott-The-Hoople said
read it, or do you want to remain ignorant.

orlando ranks #3 out of 100

Honolulu ranks #11 out of 100
100 being the safest
That's not how top 100 lists work.


@boonon said
your post
Dream on.


@boonon said
The whole post insinuates that he deserved it, FOR his words.

Simp.
The post was an answer to all these small minds thinking he's "such a great guy", and deserves half-staff flags and to lie in state in the Rotunda and for the US House to have out loud prayers instead of the more traditional moment of silence. He didn't deserve to be killed, but he doesn't deserve all the deification, either.


@mike69 said
What kind of sentence should this person get in your opinion. Going off your words not mine on how long he’s been a PROFESSIONAL driver we both know he didn’t mistake anything and knew he shouldn’t turn around there. Like I said a U with a line through it is also pretty basic.
Maybe you missed this:

no1: I leave it to fact finders to decide cases who are presented with all the evidence at trial, I don't do so based on limited information available on the web.

That applies to sentences IF he is convicted. You've made a decision based on what you regard as unimpeachable information on the web without even hearing a single word from the defense. Judges and juries don't do that and neither will I.


@no1marauder said
Maybe you missed this:

no1: I leave it to fact finders to decide cases who are presented with all the evidence at trial, I don't do so based on limited information available on the web.

That applies to sentences IF he is convicted. You've made a decision based on what you regard as unimpeachable information on the web without even hearing a single word from the defense. Judges and juries don't do that and neither will I.
There was video from the wreck showing everything I’ve said to be accurate. What other excuse could there be that’s being missed.


@no1marauder said
Did you actually watch it?

He communicates just fine.
Why did he require a translator at his court hearing then?


@no1marauder said
And has been driving on it for 3 years without an accident.

I'll leave it to the court to try the case.
Someone with the same name apparantly drove over an 88 year old bridge and absolutely destroyed it.


@DJJ said
Someone with the same name apparantly drove over an 88 year old bridge and absolutely destroyed it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kuIsdDQRdc
Same name, not him.

1 edit

@mike69 said
There was video from the wreck showing everything I’ve said to be accurate. What other excuse could there be that’s being missed.
I don't do lynch mobs based on YouTubes.

The legal process will sort it out.


@Suzianne said
Oh, please.

Your entire post is pure BS.

You not only rationalize your own behavior, but you try to rationalize mine, under your own mindset.

Not buying either.
As I said above, that Suzi is a criminal. She should be ignored, if not banned.

2 edits

@Suzianne said
The post was an answer to all these small minds thinking he's "such a great guy", and deserves half-staff flags and to lie in state in the Rotunda and for the US House to have out loud prayers instead of the more traditional moment of silence. He didn't deserve to be killed, but he doesn't deserve all the deification, either.
Its a phenomenon that seems to reflect an internet-age scrambling of everyone's brains.

People like boonon and sh76 see a guy like Charlie as someone they know personally. They were obsessed with the guy. They listen to hundreds of hours of his podcasts and hang with bated breath at every word. They literally see this person as a hero, one who occassionally says bad stuff but has championed their "side" ever since the liberals destroyed everything (when they did that is unclear). These people are the minority, but they feel like everyone should revere the guy and treat him like a god.

A large fraction of our population, though, had either never heard of Charlie Kirk before (like myself) or had heard he was some kind of buffoon or internet troll who was saying offensive things just for internet clicks and fancy cars. The thought of his body being flown on Air Force one and lying in state and a national day of mourning and flags at half mast is so incredibly over the top stupid. For a rage-bait podcast influencer?

Most NFL teams played a tribute to Charlie Kirk before the game. The "stick to sports" group seemed to love it when a prayer circle forms at a football game for this guy, they just can't handle it if Colin Kaepernick does it or they disagree with the cause. Really really dumb.

1 edit

@wildgrass said
Its a phenomenon that seems to reflect an internet-age scrambling of everyone's brains.

People like boonon and sh76 see a guy like Charlie as someone they know personally. They were obsessed with the guy. They listen to hundreds of hours of his podcasts and hang with bated breath at every word. They literally see this person as a hero, one who occassionally says bad stuf ...[text shortened]... ll game for this guy, they just can't handle it if they disagree with the cause. Really really dumb.
What’s really dumb is reading these clown words while you actually think you’re hitting the nail on the head in describing him. Of course this is the description you come to understand from your hive mind, bash everyone that doesn’t think as your party does.